IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v6y2018i3p180-189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disaster Risk Governance in Indonesia and Myanmar: The Practice of Co-Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Annisa Gita Srikandini

    (Department of International Relations, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia)

  • Dorothea Hilhorst

    (International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Roanne van Voorst

    (International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

This article discusses the discourse and practice of co-governance in disaster risk reduction (DRR). It is based on an extensive ethnographic study of DRR at global level and in two disaster-prone countries in Southeast Asia: Indonesia and Myanmar. These country cases were selected not only because of their similarly high vulnerability to disasters, but also because the overlaps and differences between them in disaster governance allowed for a comparative study of the impacts of co-governance in DRR. Indonesia is characterised by a longer history with democratic governance institutions and a largely national-led response to disasters; Myanmar has only started to develop DRR in the last 10 years, and its policies are still largely led by international actors. In both countries, disaster response has shifted from being top-down and state-centred to following a co-governance approach. This reflects a worldwide trend in DRR, the idea being that co-governance, where different state and non-state stakeholders are involved in governance networks, will lead to more inclusive and effective DRR. Our findings suggest that, in Myanmar and Indonesia, DRR has indeed become more inclusive. However, at the same time, we find that DRR in both countries has remained highly hierarchical and state-centred. Although the possible gains of encouraging future initiatives among different actors negotiating disaster response is under-explored, we find that, to date, the multiplication of actors involved in DRR, especially within the state, has led to an increasingly complex, competitive system that negatively affects the ability to conduct DRR.

Suggested Citation

  • Annisa Gita Srikandini & Dorothea Hilhorst & Roanne van Voorst, 2018. "Disaster Risk Governance in Indonesia and Myanmar: The Practice of Co-Governance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 180-189.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:6:y:2018:i:3:p:180-189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1598
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kohler-Koch, Beate, 2005. "European governance and system integration," European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) 1, CONNEX and EUROGOV networks.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Evangelia Karasmanaki & Giorgos Mallinis & Ioannis Mitsopoulos & Apostolos Karteris & Irene Chrysafis & Dimitrios Bakaloudis & Ioannis P. Kokkoris & Fotis Maris & Margarita Arianoutsou & Johann G. Gol, 2023. "Proposing a Governance Model for Environmental Crises," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrei MORARU, 2016. "European Union Democratic Governance: A Case Study Of The European Citizens’ Initiative," Europolity – Continuity and Change in European Governance - New Series, Department of International Relations and European Integration, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 10(2), pages 1-31.
    2. Karolina Boronska-Hryniewiecka, 2013. "Subnational parliaments in EU policy control: explaining the variations across Europe," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 38, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:6:y:2018:i:3:p:180-189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.