IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v4y2016i1p9-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures

Author

Listed:
  • Gert-Jan Put

    (Public Governance Institute, University of Leuven, Belgium)

  • Steven Van Hecke

    (Public Governance Institute, University of Leuven, Belgium)

  • Corey Cunningham

    (Public Governance Institute, University of Leuven, Belgium)

  • Wouter Wolfs

    (Public Governance Institute, University of Leuven, Belgium)

Abstract

The selection of leading candidates by the political families, the so-called Spitzenkandidaten, is relatively groundbreaking as it is the first form of political recruitment organized at the EU level. The literature on candidate selection procedures has so far concentrated on national parties and their procedures. To our knowledge the analytical model has not yet been applied at the EU level. This article will fill this gap by examining the selection procedures of Europarties, more particularly for their EC presidency candidates, a novelty of the 2014 European Parliament elections. Based on the analysis of the procedures applied within the European People’s Party (EPP), the Party of European Socialists (PES), the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party (ALDE), the European Green Party (EGP), and the Party of the European Left (EL), one of the main findings of this article is that the procedures are largely copy-paste from the Europarties’ internal procedures for selecting a president. This can largely be explained by the lack of time and experience their party elites had in the run-up to the 2014 elections. We therefore expect the Europarties to further professionalize their selection procedures and start the process earlier with more high profile politicians to stand as candidates in 2019.

Suggested Citation

  • Gert-Jan Put & Steven Van Hecke & Corey Cunningham & Wouter Wolfs, 2016. "The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 9-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:4:y:2016:i:1:p:9-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/469
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Harmel & Kenneth Janda, 1994. "An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 6(3), pages 259-287, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katjana Gattermann & Claes De Vreese & Wouter van der Brug, 2016. "Evaluations of the Spitzenkandidaten: The Role of Information and News Exposure in Citizens’ Preference Formation," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 37-54.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyytinen, Ari & Merilã„Inen, Jaakko & Saarimaa, Tuukka & Toivanen, Otto & Tukiainen, Janne, 2018. "Public Employees as Politicians: Evidence from Close Elections," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 112(1), pages 68-81, February.
    2. Meriläinen, Jaakko & Tukiainen, Janne, 2016. "Primary Effect in Open-List Elections," Working Papers 79, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Emilie Van Haute & Jean-Benoît Pilet, 2007. "Opening and Democratizing Pilar Parties? Internal reforms in Belgian political parties," Cahiers du CEVIPOL/Brussels Working papers 44258, Centre d'étude de la vie politique (CEVIPOL) of the Université Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Jaakko Meriläinen & Janne Tukiainen, 2018. "Rank effects in political promotions," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 177(1), pages 87-109, October.
    5. repec:ulb:ulbcvp:p0004 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Emilie Van Haute & Jean-Benoît Pilet, 2007. "Opening and Democratizing Pilar Parties? Internal reforms in Belgian political parties," CEVIPOL Working Papers 2007/1, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    7. repec:gig:joupla:v:6:y:2014:i:1:p:109-136 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:4:y:2016:i:1:p:9-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.