Author
Listed:
- Alvaro Oleart
(Department of Political Science, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium / Institute for European Studies, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium)
- Gilles Pittoors
(Department of Political Science, KU Leuven, Belgium)
Abstract
Volt Europa emerged in 2017 as a transnational political party with aspirations to become the first established EU political party. Volt emerged not as a federation of national parties—as the existing “Europarties”—but as an aspiring pan-European party. In doing so, Volt challenged the pre-existing national representative logic of European politics, presenting itself as an alternative to the dominant party models in EU politics. Yet, to what extent does Volt Europa represent a genuinely alternative model? To answer this question, we identify three Europarty models in the EU: national, supranational, and transnational. While the former two express the EU’s classic representative dichotomy, the latter could be a genuine innovation if implemented. We then explore Volt’s trajectory, focusing on its ideology, discourse and organisation through extensive document analysis and semi-structured interviews. We find that, despite meaningful attempts at establishing a transnational organisation, it largely reproduces the national vs. supranational dichotomy that characterises the EU’s approach to democracy, while maintaining centrist-technocratic politics and a strong German–Dutch anchoring. Therefore, we conclude that, while Volt is an important case study of innovative political practices at the supranational level, it falls short of presenting a convincing alternative model: its combination of supranational and transnational elements rather highlights the limits of trickle-down representative innovation when faced with the European political field’s structural dynamics.
Suggested Citation
Alvaro Oleart & Gilles Pittoors, 2026.
"Volt Europa: A Transnational Model of Representation in the EU Multilevel Party Field?,"
Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
Handle:
RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:11982
DOI: 10.17645/pag.11982
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:11982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.