Author
Listed:
- Cheryl Boudreau
(Department of Political Science, University of California – Davis, USA)
- Jennifer Gaudette
(School of Public Policy, University of California – Riverside, USA)
- Thad Kousser
(Department of Political Science, University of California – San Diego, USA)
- Seth J. Hill
(Department of Political Science, University of California – San Diego, USA)
- Mackenzie Lockhart
(Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University, USA)
- Laura Uribe
(Department of Political Science, University of California – San Diego, USA)
Abstract
To address the challenge of declining trust in American democracy in the wake of the 2020 presidential contest, election officials across the nation have undertaken innovative public information campaigns. Academic studies demonstrate that exposure to these messages can increase public confidence but do not show which types of messages are most effective. We report a set of three experimental studies that harness research–practice partnerships with these officials to vary one key aspect of an informational message while holding other features constant. The pre-registered experiments (accessible at: https://osf.io/y38sp; https://osf.io/fya69): (a) compare the impact of messages conveyed through earned versus paid media; (b) ask whether Americans are more responsive to messages from federal or from state election officials; (c) explore the impact of videos and static visuals. Taken together, this set of collaborative experiments demonstrates the unique opportunity that research–practice partnerships allow to test real-world messages through strong causal inference techniques, providing rigorous evidence that can inform practice on the front lines of American democracy.
Suggested Citation
Cheryl Boudreau & Jennifer Gaudette & Thad Kousser & Seth J. Hill & Mackenzie Lockhart & Laura Uribe, 2026.
"How Research–Practice Partnerships Can Strengthen Experiments Designed to Build Trust in American Elections,"
Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
Handle:
RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:11692
DOI: 10.17645/pag.11692
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:11692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.