IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v14y2026a10605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who’s Got MPs’ Back? Understanding the Drivers of Specialisation in the Offices of MPs

Author

Listed:
  • Lena Stephan

    (Department of Political Science and Communication Studies, University of Greifswald, Germany)

  • Anna-Lena Högenauer

    (Department of Social Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg)

Abstract

Being an elected MP comes with numerous time‐consuming and work‐intensive tasks that exceed the capacity of a single individual. While not universal, in many parliamentary democracies, MPs receive funds to employ personal staff, who take on substantial portions of this workload by advising and supporting MPs in their daily political activities. Although the role of parliamentary administrations has received growing scholarly attention, the question of how tasks are divided within MPs’ offices—particularly what drives the specialisation of staff—remains underexplored. This article addresses this gap by investigating the drivers of task specialisation in MPs’ offices through a comparative study of Germany, Luxembourg, and Austria. Drawing on 15 semi‐structured expert interviews with staff from the three countries, we show that the main drivers of specialisation in teams of personal staff are team size, party organization, government‐opposition dynamics, MPs’ working style, and the trustee relationship between MPs and their staff. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of organisational diversity among European parliaments more broadly and pave the way for Large‐? comparative studies on the factors that shape the division of labour within and between staff groups. We highlight the importance of considering both institutional and individual‐level factors when studying and comparing parliamentary support structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Lena Stephan & Anna-Lena Högenauer, 2026. "Who’s Got MPs’ Back? Understanding the Drivers of Specialisation in the Offices of MPs," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:10605
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.10605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/10605
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.10605?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephan Meier & Matthew Stephenson & Patryk Perkowski, 2019. "Culture of trust and division of labor in nonhierarchical teams," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(8), pages 1171-1193, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gianluigi Giustiziero, 2021. "Is the division of labor limited by the extent of the market? Opportunity cost theory with evidence from the real estate brokerage industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(7), pages 1344-1378, July.
    2. Saerom (Ronnie) Lee, 2022. "The myth of the flat start‐up: Reconsidering the organizational structure of start‐ups," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 58-92, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:10605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.