Author
    
Abstract
The work of parliamentary staff is essential for the functioning of the German Bundestag and the French Assemblée nationale, which present two distinct national parliaments. Parliamentary employees have various tasks, such as providing and brokering information, advising, ghostwriting, or facilitating compromises. However, their concrete activities have not yet been sufficiently explored. Therefore, this article identifies and compares the predominant roles and functions of French and German parliamentary staff by applying an extended version of the role/type matrix by Brandsma and Otjes (2024). It determines four organisational roles in both parliaments: general administrative staff, committee staff, parliamentary party group staff, and personal staff. The empirical findings suggest that these organisational roles differ largely in size and function between the two legislatures. In general, the Bundestag is much better staffed than the Assemblée nationale. While parliamentary party group and personal staff have similar functions (but not size), there is a striking difference in terms of committee staff. The French parliamentary administration puts a higher share of its staff into committee work than the German counterpart. This corresponds to the fact that German committee staff are mainly organisers while the French colleagues fulfil a whole range of functions such as advising, facilitating compromises, and ghostwriting.
Suggested Citation
  Henriette Heimbach, 2026.
"Working Behind the Scenes: Roles and Functions of French and German Parliamentary Staff,"
Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
Handle: 
RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:10549
DOI: 10.17645/pag.10549
 
    
  
    Download full text from publisher
       
 
  
 
    Corrections
    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:10549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
      
      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
      
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
      
        For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
      the various RePEc services.