IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v13y2025a9932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shifting Grounds of Collaboration in Changing Contexts: Evolving Environmental Networks in the Basque Country

Author

Listed:
  • Alejandro Ciordia

    (Maastricht Sustainability Institute, Maastricht University, The Netherlands / Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, Scuola Normale Superiore, Italy)

  • Luigi Schiavo

    (Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, Scuola Normale Superiore, Italy)

  • Mario Diani

    (Department of Sociology and Social Research, University of Trento, Italy)

Abstract

Interorganizational collaboration is crucial for collective action and political activism, particularly in environmental advocacy. Social network analysis tools are increasingly used to study collaboration among civic and political actors outside traditional institutions. While the literature has examined multiple factors influencing collaboration, less attention has been paid to how their predictive power evolves over time in response to contextual political shifts. This article aims to fill this gap by exploring the impact of rapid political changes on collaborative relationships in collective action. Using data on interorganizational collaboration within the environmental collective action field in the Basque Country (Spain) between 2007 and 2017, we analyze how large-scale transformative events and cycles of contention moderate the influence of various predictors of collaborative ties. More specifically, we use statistical network analyses to examine the relative impact of seven determinants of event co-attendance across six yearly observations. Our findings indicate that during the last years of violent conflict, shared identification with Basque nationalism facilitated collaboration, while disagreements over ETA’s armed struggle hindered it. However, in the post-conflict phase, ideological factors lost relevance, suggesting a shift from a model of “militant confrontation” to one of “pragmatic cooperation.” Nonetheless, pragmatic considerations did not completely replace ideological commitments as the main drivers of collaboration. Instead of a straightforward shift, this transition is characterized by the blurring of previous boundaries, not by the establishment of clearly defined new structuring factors. As a result, the collaboration network has become more pluralistic but also less predictable.

Suggested Citation

  • Alejandro Ciordia & Luigi Schiavo & Mario Diani, 2025. "Shifting Grounds of Collaboration in Changing Contexts: Evolving Environmental Networks in the Basque Country," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:9932
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.9932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/9932
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.9932?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clare Saunders & Sam Nadel & Bob Walley, 2025. "It’s Not Just Structural: Political Context and London’s Environmental Networks Twenty‐One Years Later," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    2. Cranmer, Skyler J. & Desmarais, Bruce A., 2011. "Inferential Network Analysis with Exponential Random Graph Models," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 66-86, January.
    3. Clare Saunders, 2009. "It's Not Just Structural: Social Movements are not Homogenous Responses to Structural Features, but Networks shaped by Organisational Strategies and Status," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 14(1), pages 26-41, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Darko Cherepnalkoski & Andreas Karpf & Igor Mozetič & Miha Grčar, 2016. "Cohesion and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Roll-Call Votes and Twitter Activities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-27, November.
    2. Cornelius Fritz & Michael Lebacher & Göran Kauermann, 2020. "Tempus volat, hora fugit: A survey of tie‐oriented dynamic network models in discrete and continuous time," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 275-299, August.
    3. Ruslan Rinatovich Abezgildin, 0. "Relevant Issues Determining the Effectiveness of Policy Networks," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 10.
    4. Olivier Godechot & Joanne Horton & Yuval Millo, 2022. "Executive Pay: Board Reciprocity Counts," Post-Print hal-03924965, HAL.
    5. Jan Beyers & Tom Donas, 2014. "Inter-regional networks in Brussels: Analyzing the information exchanges among regional offices," European Union Politics, , vol. 15(4), pages 547-571, December.
    6. Dong, Qingli & Zhao, Yanzhi & Ma, Xiaojun & Zhou, Yanan, 2024. "Risk spillover between carbon markets and stock markets from a progressive perspective: Measurements, spillover networks, and driving factors," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    7. Scott W. Duxbury, 2024. "Collaborating on the Carceral State: Political Elite Polarization and the Expansion of Federal Crime Legislation Networks, 1979 to 2005," American Sociological Review, , vol. 89(4), pages 650-683, August.
    8. Ondřej Černý & Petr Ocelík, 2020. "Incumbents’ Strategies in Media Coverage: A Case of the Czech Coal Policy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 272-285.
    9. Pauls, Scott D. & Cranmer, Skyler J., 2017. "Affinity communities in United Nations voting: Implications for democracy, cooperation, and conflict," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 484(C), pages 428-439.
    10. Daniele Fanelli & Wolfgang Glänzel, 2013. "Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the Sciences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-11, June.
    11. Durante, Daniele & Dunson, David B., 2014. "Bayesian dynamic financial networks with time-varying predictors," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 19-26.
    12. Gallemore, Caleb & Di Gregorio, Monica & Moeliono, Moira & Brockhaus, Maria & Prasti H., Rut Dini, 2015. "Transaction costs, power, and multi-level forest governance in Indonesia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 168-179.
    13. Ondřej Černý & Petr Ocelík, 2020. "Incumbents’ Strategies in Media Coverage: A Case of the Czech Coal Policy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 272-285.
    14. Fred Feinberg & Elizabeth Bruch & Michael Braun & Brett Hemenway Falk & Nina Fefferman & Elea McDonnell Feit & John Helveston & Daniel Larremore & Blakeley B. McShane & Alice Patania & Mario L. Small, 2020. "Choices in networks: a research framework," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 349-359, December.
    15. Clare Saunders & Sam Nadel & Bob Walley, 2025. "It’s Not Just Structural: Political Context and London’s Environmental Networks Twenty‐One Years Later," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    16. Emily V. Bell, 2024. "Climate risk perceptions, change in water demand, and preferences for future interlocal collaboration," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(7), pages 1-21, July.
    17. Jungwon Yeo, 2023. "Interorganizational Coordination for Immigrant Integration into Local Society," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 567-585, June.
    18. Alexandra Goritz & Nina Kolleck & Helge Jörgens, 2019. "Education for Sustainable Development and Climate Change Education: The Potential of Social Network Analysis Based on Twitter Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, October.
    19. Sudeshna Paul & A. James O'Malley, 2013. "Hierarchical longitudinal models of relationships in social networks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(5), pages 705-722, November.
    20. Daniel Straulino & Mattie Landman & Neave O'Clery, 2020. "A bi-directional approach to comparing the modular structure of networks," Papers 2010.06568, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:9932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.