IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v13y2025a10437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Offshore Embeddedness Beyond the Wall: Chinese Cloud Providers in Southeast Asia’s Data Governance Landscape

Author

Listed:
  • Binyi Yang

    (S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore)

  • Mingjiang Li

    (S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University)

Abstract

Why do middle power states permit companies from institutionally controversial jurisdictions to build and run critical cloud infrastructure on their soil, despite pronounced data governance concerns? How do such firms convert deep suspicion into durable market legitimacy amid intensifying geopolitical competition? Drawing on case studies of Alibaba Cloud and Tencent Cloud across five ASEAN countries (2015–2024), this article proposes the concept of offshore embeddedness : a legitimacy strategy that combines demonstrable separation from home-state control with deep integration into host-state governance structures. Three mechanisms underpin this strategy: regulatory-infrastructure convergence through exhaustive certification and sovereign cloud builds, network integration via stakeholder coalitions that fuse firm survival to domestic political interests, and organizational decoupling accomplished through verifiable legal separation from home-country governance. ASEAN governments shape these outcomes by acting as gatekeeper-regulators (imposing localization and audit preconditions), infrastructure brokers (exchanging market access for domestic data center investment and skills transfer), and coalition orchestrators (embedding foreign clouds within host-led political-economic networks). Through these roles, domestic data governance frameworks shift from exclusionary shields to leverage tools, recalibrating digital governance and binary US–China narratives.

Suggested Citation

  • Binyi Yang & Mingjiang Li, 2025. "Offshore Embeddedness Beyond the Wall: Chinese Cloud Providers in Southeast Asia’s Data Governance Landscape," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:10437
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.10437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/10437
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.10437?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Boyer, 2005. "How and why capitalisms differ," Post-Print halshs-00754052, HAL.
    2. Boyer, Robert, 2005. "How and Why Capitalisms Differ," MPIfG Discussion Paper 05/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Robert Boyer, 2005. "How and why capitalisms differ," Post-Print hal-00812971, HAL.
    4. Jing Li & Klaus E Meyer & Hua Zhang & Yuan Ding, 2018. "Diplomatic and corporate networks: Bridges to foreign locations," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(6), pages 659-683, August.
    5. Dennis Broeders & Arun Sukumar & Monica Kello & Lise H. Andersen, 2025. "Digital corporate autonomy: geo-economics and corporate agency in conflict and competition," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 1189-1213, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beckert, Jens & Ebbinghaus, Bernhard & Hassel, Anke & Manow, Philip (ed.), 2006. "Transformationen des Kapitalismus: Festschrift für Wolfgang Streeck zum sechzigsten Geburtstag," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 57, number 57.
    2. David Neilson, 2021. "Beyond Regressive Nationalism and the Neoliberal Model of Development," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 53(1), pages 17-34, March.
    3. Almeida, Renan P. & Hungaro, Lucas, 2021. "Water and sanitation governance between austerity and financialization," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. ten Brink, Tobias, 2010. "Strukturmerkmale des chinesischen Kapitalismus," MPIfG Discussion Paper 10/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    5. Fritz, Martin & Koch, Max, 2014. "Potentials for prosperity without growth: Ecological sustainability, social inclusion and the quality of life in 38 countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 191-199.
    6. Naoise McDonagh, 2021. "Credit Guidance for a Desired Economy: An Original Institutional Economics Critique of Financialization," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 53(4), pages 675-693, December.
    7. Reale, Filippo, 2019. "Governing innovation systems: A Parsonian social systems perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Céline Gainet, 2010. "Exploring the Impact of Legal Systems and Financial Structure on Corporate Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(2), pages 195-222, September.
    9. Rachael Gibson & Harald Bathelt, 2014. "Proximity relations and global knowledge flows: specialization and diffusion processes across capitalist varieties," Chapters, in: André Torre & Frédéric Wallet (ed.), Regional Development and Proximity Relations, chapter 9, pages 291-314, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Alexander Ebner, 2010. "Varieties of Capitalism and the Limits of Entrepreneurship Policy: Institutional Reform in Germany’s Coordinated Market Economy," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 319-341, September.
    11. Vladimír Baláž, 2006. "Politická ekonómia slovenského kapitalizmu: inštitucionálna a evolučná perspektíva [Political economy of the slovak capitalism from perspective of the institutional and evolutionary economics]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2006(5), pages 610-631.
    12. Lisa Rustico & Ramona David & Antonio Ranieri, 2020. "‘Apprenticeship’ in the Italian approach to the dual system," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(1), pages 91-103, February.
    13. Hein, Eckhard & Dodig, Nina & Budyldina, Natalia, 2014. "Financial, economic and social systems: French Regulation School, Social Structures of Accumulation and Post-Keynesian approaches compared," IPE Working Papers 34/2014, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    14. Kalinowski, Thomas, 2013. "Crisis management and the varieties of capitalism: Fiscal stimulus packages and the transformation of East Asian state-led capitalism since 2008," Discussion Papers, Project Group Modes of Economic Governance SP III 2013-501, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    15. Bridget O'Laughlin, 2008. "Forum 2008," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 39(6), pages 945-957, November.
    16. Leuze, Kathrin, 2010. "Smooth Path or Long and Winding Road? How Institutions Shape the Transition from Higher Education to Work," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 251573, April.
    17. Alexei Izyumov & Trista Claxon, 2009. "Models of Capitalism and Income Distribution in Transition Economies: A Comparative Perspective," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 733-758.
    18. Víctor Ramiro Fernández & Matthias Ebenau & Alcides Bazza, 2018. "Rethinking Varieties of Capitalism from the Latin American Periphery," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 50(2), pages 392-408, June.
    19. Weiping Liu & Jiatao Li, 2019. "Unbalanced Institutions in Market Transition: How Do They Matter for Firm Strategic Choices and Performance in Emerging Economies?," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 675-702, October.
    20. Jonnergård Karin & Larsson-Olaison Ulf, 2018. "Doxa of Shareholders and Owners: On the Threshold of Financialization," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 8(3), pages 1-18, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:10437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.