IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v13y2025a10243.html

Reconceptualizing Technological Leadership: A Relational and Dynamic Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Yuanyuan Fang

    (School of International Politics and Communication, Beijing Language and Culture University, China)

  • Shenghao Zhang

    (Institute for International Relations, Tsinghua University, China)

Abstract

This article challenges conventional economic‐based understandings of technological leadership, which often conflate technological leadership with innovation capability or leading status in the technology sector. Instead, it develops a relational and dynamic framework for understanding technological leadership from an IR perspective. It introduces a novel typology differentiating leadership from leading, and followership from imitation and purchase. Technological leadership is defined as the relational and dynamic process through which a state establishes and sustains influence by setting and enforcing rules, standards, and frameworks that guide innovation and collaboration within a technological ecosystem. The formation of technological leadership is a complex and dynamic process, involving interaction between leaders, followers, and the technological environment, shaped by leadership behaviors, followers’ choices, and technological context. This article applies the proposed framework to examine the US–China rivalry for global leadership in artificial intelligence. Through a systematic analysis of AI‐related policy documents from both nations spanning the period from 2016 to 2025, the study elucidates how these two major powers have formulated their respective AI leadership strategies and influenced the evolution of global AI governance. The analysis reveals that US leadership in AI is characterized by a dual‐focused approach that integrates technological advancement with value‐oriented governance, manifesting through three key dimensions: ethical governance frameworks, international collaborative initiatives, and strategic competitive measures. China’s leadership behavior, adhering to the principle of mutual benefit, manifests primarily through infrastructure development and standard‐setting, adopting a development‐centric approach. However, the formation of technological leadership is not solely determined by US and Chinese strategies but is equally influenced by the strategic choices of follower states. Consequently, the ultimate trajectory of the US–China rivalry in AI leadership will predominantly depend on both nations’ capacity to attract and maintain follower support.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuanyuan Fang & Shenghao Zhang, 2025. "Reconceptualizing Technological Leadership: A Relational and Dynamic Framework," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:10243
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.10243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/10243
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.10243?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Can Huang & Naubahar Sharif, 2016. "Global technology leadership: The case of China," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(1), pages 62-73.
    2. Strange, Susan, 1987. "The Persistent myth of lost hegemony," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(4), pages 551-574, October.
    3. Jeffrey Ding, 2024. "The diffusion deficit in scientific and technological power: re-assessing China’s rise," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 173-198, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alami, Ilias & Alves, Carolina & Bonizzi, Bruno & Kaltenbrunner, Annina & Kodddenbrock, Kai & Kvangraven, Ingrid & Powell, Jeff, 2021. "International financial subordination: a critical research agenda [working paper]," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 33233, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    2. Till Köveker & Fernanda Ballesteros & Franziska Klaucke & Antonia Kurz & Karsten Neuhoff & Paula Niemöller & Sangeeth Selvaraju, 2025. "Industry Transition to Climate Neutrality: Comparing Policy Approaches in Times of Geopolitical Fragmentation," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2114, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Keyan Lai, 2021. "National security and FDI policy ambiguity: A commentary," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(4), pages 496-505, December.
    4. Stephen, Matthew D., 2014. "Rising powers, global capitalism and liberal global governance: A historical materialist account of the BRICs challenge," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(4), pages 912-938.
    5. Jugend, Daniel & Fiorini, Paula De Camargo & Armellini, Fabiano & Ferrari, Aline Gabriela, 2020. "Public support for innovation: A systematic review of the literature and implications for open innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    6. Rogelio Madrueño & Magdalene Silberberger, 2022. "Dimensions and Cartography of Dirty Money in Developing Countries: Tripping Up on the Global Hydra," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 25-39.
    7. Rogelio Madrueño & Magdalene Silberberger, 2022. "Dimensions and Cartography of Dirty Money in Developing Countries: Tripping Up on the Global Hydra," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 25-39.
    8. Daniel Seikel, 2016. "Flexible Austerity and Supranational Autonomy. The Reformed Excessive Deficit Procedure and the Asymmetry between Liberalization and Social Regulation in the EU," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(6), pages 1398-1416, November.
    9. Brezis, Elise & Rubin, Amir, 2025. "Polarization in Higher Education and Technological Leadership," MPRA Paper 124200, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Flemes, Daniel & Wojczewski, Thorsten, 2010. "Contested Leadership in International Relations: Power Politics in South America, South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa," GIGA Working Papers 121, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    11. Xing, Jack Linzhou & Sharif, Naubahar, 2020. "From creative destruction to creative appropriation: A comprehensive framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    12. Branka Mraović, 2010. "The geopolitics of currencies and the issue of monetary sovereignty," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(2), pages 183-196, June.
    13. Thierry Pairault, 2017. "China in the Maghreb: From the Spirit of Bandung to the Spirit of Capitalism [La Chine au Maghreb : de l’esprit de Bandung à l’esprit du capitalisme]," Post-Print halshs-01556325, HAL.
    14. Sandy Gordon, 2010. "Nation, Neighbourhood and Region: India’s Emergence as an Asia Power," South Asian Survey, , vol. 17(2), pages 199-217, September.
    15. Rafael Mesquita, 2024. "The only living guerrillero in New York: Cuba and the brokerage power of a resilient revisionist state," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 611-639, September.
    16. Han, Xia & Lukoianove, Tatiana & Zhao, Shasha & Liu, Xiaohui, 2024. "International relations in international business research: A review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    17. Fichtner, Jan & Heemskerk, Eelke & Petry, Johannes, 2021. "The new gatekeepers of financial claims: States, passive markets, and the growing power of index providers," SocArXiv x45j3, Center for Open Science.
    18. James Ashley Morrison & Avery F. White, 2011. "International Regimes and War," Chapters, in: Christopher J. Coyne & Rachel L. Mathers (ed.), The Handbook on the Political Economy of War, chapter 18, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. repec:osf:socarx:x45j3_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Pustovitovskij, Andrej & Kremer, Jan-Frederik, 2011. "Structural Power and International Relations Analysis: "Fill your basket, get your preferences"," IEE Working Papers 191, Ruhr University Bochum, Institute of Development Research and Development Policy (IEE).
    21. Pierre-Olivier Peytral, 2004. "Economie politique de la politique d'ouverture commerciale mixte : interactions entre les groupes sociaux et l'Etat," Post-Print halshs-00104875, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:10243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.