IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v13y2025a10184.html

Forests in the Spotlight: Discourse Coalitions and Storylines Shaping the EU Nature Restoration Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Fleckenstein

    (Chair of Forest and Environmental Policy, University of Freiburg, Germany / Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland)

  • Simon Schaub

    (Institute of Political Science, Heidelberg University, Germany / Heidelberg Center for the Environment, Heidelberg University, Germany)

  • Metodi Sotirov

    (Chair of Forest and Environmental Policy, University of Freiburg, Germany)

Abstract

The adoption of the proposal for an EU Nature Restoration Regulation (EU-NRR) in 2022 sparked controversial debates across environmental policy domains. The intensity of debate during the ordinary legislative procedure was evident in the numerous amendments and close voting outcomes within the EU legislative institutions. Although the multi-level and multi-sectoral nature of the EU environmental policy arena provides numerous opportunities and venues for political networks to influence policy processes and their outcomes, the coalition dynamics and discursive power of environmental networks remain under-researched. These dynamics are particularly evident in environmental politics, where a variety of state and non-state actors, shaped by different interests and power structures, attempt to influence political processes based on their interpretations of reality. Drawing on the discourse coalition framework and the coalition magnet concept, this study examines how coalition formation and discursive power influence policy-making processes and their outcomes. Using discourse network analysis (DNA), we analyze the policy debate around the EU-NRR to: (a) identify supporting and opposing discourse coalitions, (b) uncover forest-related storylines, and (c) assess the influence of discourse coalitions and their storylines on the policy-making process and its outcome. In doing so, we place particular emphasis on forest ecosystems, which have historically played a minor role in EU policies. Based on an analysis of 328 public statements and a process tracing of key policy outputs, this study highlights how coalition formation and discursive power dynamics within political networks play a critical role in shaping environmental policy-making. Furthermore, it provides valuable insights into the development of the EU-NRR—the EU’s first directly applicable and legally binding forest-related policy instrument.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Fleckenstein & Simon Schaub & Metodi Sotirov, 2025. "Forests in the Spotlight: Discourse Coalitions and Storylines Shaping the EU Nature Restoration Regulation," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:10184
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.10184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/10184
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.10184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefano Ghinoi & Bodo Steiner, 2020. "The Political Debate on Climate Change in Italy: A Discourse Network Analysis," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 215-228.
    2. Stefano Ghinoi & Bodo Steiner, 2020. "The Political Debate on Climate Change in Italy: A Discourse Network Analysis," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 215-228.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philip Leifeld, 2020. "Policy Debates and Discourse Network Analysis: A Research Agenda," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 180-183.
    2. Benedetta Barchielli & Clarissa Cricenti & Francesca Gallè & Elita Anna Sabella & Fabrizio Liguori & Giovanna Da Molin & Giorgio Liguori & Giovanni Battista Orsi & Anna Maria Giannini & Stefano Ferrac, 2022. "Climate Changes, Natural Resources Depletion, COVID-19 Pandemic, and Russian-Ukrainian War: What Is the Impact on Habits Change and Mental Health?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Rachel Germanier & Niccolò Moricciani, 2023. "Perceiving and Adapting to Climate Change: Perspectives of Tuscan Wine-Producing Agritourism Owners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Clarissa Caimol, 2022. "The policies, the actions, and the political-administrative organization of Emilia-Romagna region to combat the climate change: a social network approach," SEEDS Working Papers 0922, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Sep 2022.
    5. Aryal, Kishor & Laudari, Hari Krishna & Maraseni, Tek & Pathak, Bhoj Raj, 2022. "Navigating policy debates of and discourse coalitions on Nepal's Scientific Forest Management," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    6. Lifang Guo & Hewu Kuang & Zehua Ni, 2023. "A step towards green economic policy framework: role of renewable energy and climate risk for green economic recovery," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3095-3115, October.
    7. Philip Leifeld, 2020. "Policy Debates and Discourse Network Analysis: A Research Agenda," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 180-183.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:10184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.