Author
    
      
        Listed:
          
- Simon Fleckenstein (Chair of Forest and Environmental Policy, University of Freiburg, Germany / Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland) 
- Simon Schaub (Institute of Political Science, Heidelberg University, Germany / Heidelberg Center for the Environment, Heidelberg University, Germany) 
- Metodi Sotirov (Chair of Forest and Environmental Policy, University of Freiburg, Germany) 
 
 
Abstract
The adoption of the proposal for an EU Nature Restoration Regulation (EU-NRR) in 2022 sparked controversial debates across environmental policy domains. The intensity of debate during the ordinary legislative procedure was evident in the numerous amendments and close voting outcomes within the EU legislative institutions. Although the multi-level and multi-sectoral nature of the EU environmental policy arena provides numerous opportunities and venues for political networks to influence policy processes and their outcomes, the coalition dynamics and discursive power of environmental networks remain under-researched. These dynamics are particularly evident in environmental politics, where a variety of state and non-state actors, shaped by different interests and power structures, attempt to influence political processes based on their interpretations of reality. Drawing on the discourse coalition framework and the coalition magnet concept, this study examines how coalition formation and discursive power influence policy-making processes and their outcomes. Using discourse network analysis (DNA), we analyze the policy debate around the EU-NRR to: (a) identify supporting and opposing discourse coalitions, (b) uncover forest-related storylines, and (c) assess the influence of discourse coalitions and their storylines on the policy-making process and its outcome. In doing so, we place particular emphasis on forest ecosystems, which have historically played a minor role in EU policies. Based on an analysis of 328 public statements and a process tracing of key policy outputs, this study highlights how coalition formation and discursive power dynamics within political networks play a critical role in shaping environmental policy-making. Furthermore, it provides valuable insights into the development of the EU-NRR—the EU’s first directly applicable and legally binding forest-related policy instrument.
Suggested Citation
  Simon Fleckenstein & Simon Schaub & Metodi Sotirov, 2025.
"Forests in the Spotlight: Discourse Coalitions and Storylines Shaping the EU Nature Restoration Regulation,"
Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
Handle: 
RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:10184
DOI: 10.17645/pag.10184
 
    
  
    Download full text from publisher
       
 
  
 
    Corrections
    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:10184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
      
      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
      
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
      
        For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
      the various RePEc services.