IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v10y2022i1p90-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing Citizen Engagement With European Politics on Social Media

Author

Listed:
  • Pieter de Wilde

    (Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway)

  • Astrid Rasch

    (Department of Language and Literature, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway)

  • Michael Bossetta

    (Department of Communication and Media, Lund University, Sweden)

Abstract

Contributions in this thematic issue focus explicitly on citizens and their online engagement with European politics. For social media research in the European Union, citizens remain an understudied actor type in comparison with political elites or news organizations. The reason, we argue, is four key challenges facing social media research in the European Union: legal, ethical, technical, and cultural. To introduce this thematic issue, we outline these four challenges and illustrate how they relate to each contribution. Given that these challenges are unlikely to dissipate, we stress the need for open dialogue about them. A key part of that involves contextualizing research findings within the constraints in which they are produced. Despite these challenges, the contributions showcase that a theoretical and empirical focus on citizens’ social media activity can illuminate key insights into vitally important topics for contemporary Europe. These include civic participation, institutional communication, media consumption, gender inequality, and populism.

Suggested Citation

  • Pieter de Wilde & Astrid Rasch & Michael Bossetta, 2022. "Analyzing Citizen Engagement With European Politics on Social Media," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 90-96.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:90-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5233
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Hameleers, 2022. "Empowering the People’s Truth Through Social Media? (De)Legitimizing Truth Claims of Populist Politicians and Citizens," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 210-219.
    2. Katharine Dommett & Rebekah Tromble, 2022. "Advocating for Platform Data Access: Challenges and Opportunities for Academics Seeking Policy Change," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 220-229.
    3. Anna Bil-Jaruzelska & Cristina Monzer, 2022. "All About Feelings? Emotional Appeals as Drivers of User Engagement With Facebook Posts," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 172-184.
    4. Daniel Thiele, 2022. "Pandemic Populism? How Covid-19 Triggered Populist Facebook User Comments in Germany and Austria," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 185-196.
    5. Helena Seibicke & Asimina Michailidou, 2022. "The Challenges of Reconstructing Citizen-Driven EU Contestation in the Digital Media Sphere," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 97-107.
    6. Tobias Heidenreich & Olga Eisele & Kohei Watanabe & Hajo G. Boomgaarden, 2022. "Exploring Engagement With EU News on Facebook: The Influence of Content Characteristics," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 121-132.
    7. Stefan Wallaschek & Kavyanjali Kaushik & Monika Verbalyte & Aleksandra Sojka & Giuliana Sorci & Hans-Jörg Trenz & Monika Eigmüller, 2022. "Same Same but Different? Gender Politics and (Trans-)National Value Contestation in Europe on Twitter," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 146-160.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Helena Seibicke & Asimina Michailidou, 2022. "The Challenges of Reconstructing Citizen-Driven EU Contestation in the Digital Media Sphere," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 97-107.
    2. Stefan Wallaschek & Kavyanjali Kaushik & Monika Verbalyte & Aleksandra Sojka & Giuliana Sorci & Hans-Jörg Trenz & Monika Eigmüller, 2022. "Same Same but Different? Gender Politics and (Trans-)National Value Contestation in Europe on Twitter," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 146-160.
    3. Eisele, Olga & Heidenreich, Tobias & Kriegler, Nina & Syed Ali, Pamina & Boomgaarden, Hajo G., 2022. "A window of opportunity? The relevance of the rotating European Union presidency in the public eye," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue OnlineFir, pages 1-21.
    4. Olga Eisele & Tobias Heidenreich & Nina Kriegler & Pamina Syed Ali & Hajo G. Boomgaarden, 2023. "A window of opportunity? The relevance of the rotating European Union presidency in the public eye," European Union Politics, , vol. 24(2), pages 327-347, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azucena Penelas-Leguía & Estela Nunez-Barriopedro & Jose María López-Sanz & Rafael Ravina-Ripoll, 2023. "Positioning analysis of Spanish politicians through their Twitter posts versus Spanish public opinion," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Olga Eisele & Tobias Heidenreich & Nina Kriegler & Pamina Syed Ali & Hajo G. Boomgaarden, 2023. "A window of opportunity? The relevance of the rotating European Union presidency in the public eye," European Union Politics, , vol. 24(2), pages 327-347, June.
    3. Eisele, Olga & Heidenreich, Tobias & Kriegler, Nina & Syed Ali, Pamina & Boomgaarden, Hajo G., 2022. "A window of opportunity? The relevance of the rotating European Union presidency in the public eye," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue OnlineFir, pages 1-21.
    4. Reveilhac Maud & Eisner Léïla, 2022. "Political Polarisation on Gender Equality: The Case of the Swiss Women’s Strike on Twitter," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 13(3), pages 255-278, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:90-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.