Author
Listed:
- Steven Mana‘oakamai Johnson
(Ashley School of Global Development and the Environment, Cornell University, USA)
- Angelo O. Villagomez
(Center for American Progress, USA)
Abstract
Popular ocean documentaries play a crucial role in shaping public understanding of the ocean polycrisis. This article offers a critical review of popular ocean documentaries, examining their portrayal of the complex ocean polycrisis—encompassing climate change, biodiversity loss, and unfettered capitalism. While these films achieve widespread viewership and raise awareness of critical environmental issues, this analysis argues that they frequently operate through a colonial lens, concurrently marginalizing the crucial perspectives and experiences of communities most proximate to these crises. By often prioritizing Western scientific narratives, individualistic solutions, and visually arresting but potentially decontextualized imagery, these documentaries risk obscuring the systemic impacts of historical and ongoing colonialism and neocolonialism on ocean ecosystems and the livelihoods of Indigenous communities, small‐scale fishers, and other coastal populations. This article analyzes the films’ narrative structures, visual rhetoric, and the selection (or omission) of expert voices to demonstrate how they implicitly and explicitly frame the ocean crisis and its potential solutions. We identify persistent colonial patterns across the corpus and, drawing on these findings, propose five principles for decolonial ocean documentary filmmaking—centering frontline voices, upholding historical accountability, practicing epistemic justice, maintaining structural analysis, and prioritizing relational storytelling over spectacle—demonstrating that more just and inclusive ocean narratives are not only necessary but achievable.
Suggested Citation
Steven Mana‘oakamai Johnson & Angelo O. Villagomez, 2026.
"Representation and Power in Ocean Conservation Documentaries: A Decolonial Analysis,"
Ocean and Society, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3.
Handle:
RePEc:cog:ocesoc:v3:y:2026:a:11626
DOI: 10.17645/oas.11626
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:ocesoc:v3:y:2026:a:11626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.