IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v9y2021i2p16-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pitching Gender in a Racist Tune: The Affective Publics of the #120decibel Campaign

Author

Listed:
  • Shari Adlung

    (Department of Journalism Studies, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany)

  • Margreth Lünenborg

    (Department of Journalism Studies, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany)

  • Christoph Raetzsch

    (Department of Media and Journalism Studies, Aarhus University, Denmark)

Abstract

This article analyses the changed structures, actors and modes of communication that characterise ‘dissonant public spheres.’ With the #120decibel campaign by the German Identitarian Movement in 2018, gender and migration were pitched in a racist tune, absorbing feminist concerns and positions into neo-nationalistic, misogynist and xenophobic propaganda. The article examines the case of #120decibel as an instance of ‘affective publics’ (Lünenborg, 2019a) where forms of feminist protest and emancipatory hashtag activism are absorbed by anti-migration campaigners. Employing the infrastructure and network logics of social media platforms, the campaign gained public exposure and sought political legitimacy through strategies of dissonance, in which a racial solidarity against the liberal state order was formed. Parallel structures of networking and echo-chamber amplification were established, where right-wing media articulate fringe positions in an attempt to protect the rights of white women to be safe in public spaces. #120decibel is analysed and discussed here as characteristic of the ambivalent role and dynamics of affective publics in societies challenged by an increasing number of actors forming an alliance on anti-migration issues based on questionable feminist positions.

Suggested Citation

  • Shari Adlung & Margreth Lünenborg & Christoph Raetzsch, 2021. "Pitching Gender in a Racist Tune: The Affective Publics of the #120decibel Campaign," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 16-26.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:16-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3749
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margreth Lünenborg & Tanja Maier, 2018. "The Turn to Affect and Emotion in Media Studies," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 1-4.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sofie Van Bauwel & Tonny Krijnen, 2021. "Contemporary Research on Gender and Media: It’s All Political," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 1-4.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Débora Medeiros & Ana Makhashvili, 2022. "United in Grief? Emotional Communities Around the Far-Right Terrorist Attack in Hanau," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 39-49.
    2. Precious N. Chatterje-Doody & Rhys Crilley, 2019. "Making Sense of Emotions and Affective Investments in War: RT and the Syrian Conflict on YouTube," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 167-178.
    3. Monika Taddicken & Laura Wolff, 2020. "‘Fake News’ in Science Communication: Emotions and Strategies of Coping with Dissonance Online," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 206-217.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:16-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.