IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v9y2021i1p158-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating Visual Content Shared over Twitter during the 2019 EU Parliamentary Election Campaign

Author

Listed:
  • Nahema Marchal

    (Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, UK)

  • Lisa-Maria Neudert

    (Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, UK)

  • Bence Kollanyi

    (Doctoral School of Sociology, Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary)

  • Philip N. Howard

    (Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, UK)

Abstract

Political communication increasingly takes on visual forms. Yet, despite their ubiquity in everyday communication and digital campaigning, the use of these visuals remains critically understudied. In this article, we investigate the formats and modes of visual content deployed by Twitter users over a two-week period leading up to the 2019 EU Parliamentary elections and across two publics: those discussing the election at large and those discussing the more contentious issue of EU membership. Conducting a multilingual, cross-comparative content and thematic analysis of a sample of 1,097 images, we find that: (1) Visuals originating from traditional political actors prevailed among both Twitter discourses; (2) users shared substantial amounts of anti-EU, populist and, to a lesser extent, extremist images, though this content remained largely disjointed from the mainstream public debate; and (3) political humor emerged as a vector for anti-establishment and Eurosceptic themes, especially in discussions critical of the European project. We discuss the implications of our findings for the study of visual political communication and social media manipulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Nahema Marchal & Lisa-Maria Neudert & Bence Kollanyi & Philip N. Howard, 2021. "Investigating Visual Content Shared over Twitter during the 2019 EU Parliamentary Election Campaign," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 158-170.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:158-170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3421
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Akbari, Morteza & Foroudi, Pantea & Zaman Fashami, Rahime & Mahavarpour, Nasrin & Khodayari, Maryam, 2022. "Let us talk about something: The evolution of e-WOM from the past to the future," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 663-689.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:158-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.