IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v8y2020i2p314-322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data Subjects vs. People’s Data: Competing Discourses of Privacy and Power in Modern Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Tetyana Lokot

    (School of Communications, Dublin City University, Ireland)

Abstract

The notion of individual privacy has always been a political one throughout Russia’s Soviet and post-Soviet periods, but in the age of all-encompassing datafication and digitisation of identities, privacy has become an even more contested concept. This article considers how Russian state officials and Russian digital rights advocates construct the notion of privacy in their public online discourses. I argue that how these actors talk about privacy helps shape the norms and the politics around it in Russia. An in-depth analysis of activity reports published online by the state internet regulator and a grassroots digital rights group reveals competing privacy discourses underpinned by differential understandings of how anonymity, secrecy, confidentiality, and control of personal data determine the distribution of power and agency in Russian public and political life. These differential interpretations of privacy inform the contentious politics that emerge around how privacy is regulated and negotiated within the greater regulatory and normative framework of digital citizenship in Russia. Thus, the article offers critical insights into the contestation of citizenship and, consequently, the distribution of power in more and less democratic systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Tetyana Lokot, 2020. "Data Subjects vs. People’s Data: Competing Discourses of Privacy and Power in Modern Russia," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 314-322.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:314-322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/2883
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Łukasz Wojtkowski & Barbara Brodzińska-Mirowska & Aleksandra Seklecka, 2020. "Polish Privacy Media Discourse: Privacy as Imposed Policies," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 302-313.
    2. Johanna E. Möller & Jakub Nowak & Sigrid Kannengießer & Judith E. Möller, 2020. "The Politics of Privacy—A Useful Tautology," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 232-236.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:314-322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.