IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v8y2020i2p258-269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Online Privacy Literacy Supports Self-Data Protection and Self-Determination in the Age of Information

Author

Listed:
  • Philipp K. Masur

    (Department of Communication, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany)

Abstract

Current debates on online privacy are rooted in liberal theory. Accordingly, privacy is often regarded as a form of freedom from social, economic, and institutional influences. Such a negative perspective on privacy, however, focuses too much on how individuals can be protected or can protect themselves, instead of challenging the necessity of protection itself. In this article, I argue that increasing online privacy literacy not only empowers individuals to achieve (a necessarily limited) form of negative privacy, but has the potential to facilitate a privacy deliberation process in which individuals become agents of social change that could lead to conditions of positive privacy and informational self-determination. To this end, I propose a four-dimensional model of online privacy literacy that encompasses factual privacy knowledge, privacy-related reflection abilities, privacy and data protection skills, and critical privacy literacy. I then outline how this combination of knowledge, abilities, and skills 1) enables to individuals to protect themselves against some horizontal and vertical privacy intrusions and 2) motivates individuals to critically challenge the social structures and power relations that necessitate the need for protection in the first place. Understanding these processes, as well as critically engaging with the normative premises and implications of the predominant negative concepts of privacy, offers a more nuanced direction for future research on online privacy literacy and privacy in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Philipp K. Masur, 2020. "How Online Privacy Literacy Supports Self-Data Protection and Self-Determination in the Age of Information," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 258-269.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:258-269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/2855
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emöke-Ágnes Horvát & Michael Hanselmann & Fred A Hamprecht & Katharina A Zweig, 2012. "One Plus One Makes Three (for Social Networks)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-8, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johanna E. Möller & Jakub Nowak & Sigrid Kannengießer & Judith E. Möller, 2020. "The Politics of Privacy—A Useful Tautology," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 232-236.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sætra, Henrik Skaug, 2020. "Privacy as an aggregate public good," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    2. Zexun Chen & Sean Kelty & Alexandre G. Evsukoff & Brooke Foucault Welles & James Bagrow & Ronaldo Menezes & Gourab Ghoshal, 2022. "Contrasting social and non-social sources of predictability in human mobility," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Sætra, Henrik Skaug, 2019. "Freedom under the gaze of Big Brother: Preparing the grounds for a liberal defence of privacy in the era of Big Data," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:258-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.