IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v14y2026a12178.html

The Adoption of Open Science Practices in Communication Research: Taking Stock of the Field in 2025

Author

Listed:
  • Jasmijn Kruijt

    (Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Chaoyi Gao

    (Graduate School of Communication, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Xiaojing Ke

    (Graduate School of Communication, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Sofie Přibylová

    (Graduate School of Communication, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Wenyuan Yang

    (Graduate School of Communication, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Bert N. Bakker

    (Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Five years after Dienlin et al.’s (2021) agenda-setting call for communication research to adopt open science practices, this study assesses the current state of adoption within the field. Through a manual content analysis of articles published in 2025 across 20 leading communication journals, we evaluated the use of Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) research practices. Results show that adoption remains limited. While research materials are shared more frequently, data and analytic code are rarely made available, and overall transparency remains inconsistent. Quantitative studies score higher on transparency indicators than qualitative studies, likely reflecting the limited applicability of TOP standards to qualitative research paradigms. Explicit discussion of deviations from preregistrations is present in approximately half of preregistered studies, and the absence of such discussion does not necessarily imply that deviations occurred. Yet room for improvement remains. We argue that voluntary adoption may be insufficient and discuss the need for stronger institutional incentives to establish open science as a normative standard.

Suggested Citation

  • Jasmijn Kruijt & Chaoyi Gao & Xiaojing Ke & Sofie Přibylová & Wenyuan Yang & Bert N. Bakker, 2026. "The Adoption of Open Science Practices in Communication Research: Taking Stock of the Field in 2025," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v14:y:2026:a:12178
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.12178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/12178
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.12178?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v14:y:2026:a:12178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.