Author
Listed:
- Danielle A. Maxwell-Fraser
(Department of Media Studies, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
- Iris M. Baas
(Department of Media and Journalism Studies, University of Groningen, The Netherlands)
- Sarah Burkhardt
(Department of Media Studies, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
- Olga Eisele
(Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
- Anne C. Kroon
(Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
- Robert Jan Bood
(Scalable Data Analytics, SURF, The Netherlands)
- Iris Geldermans
(National Library of the Netherlands, The Netherlands)
- Sophie Ham
(National Library of the Netherlands, The Netherlands)
- Machiel Jansen
(Scalable Data Analytics, SURF, The Netherlands)
- Rana Klein
(Netherlands Institute for Sound & Vision, The Netherlands)
- Matthijs Moed
(Scalable Data Analytics, SURF, The Netherlands)
- Roeland Ordelman
(Netherlands Institute for Sound & Vision, The Netherlands)
- Erik Tjong Kim Sang
(Netherlands eScience Centre, The Netherlands)
- Mari Wigham
(Netherlands Institute for Sound & Vision, The Netherlands / Huygens Institute for History and Culture of the Netherlands, The Netherlands)
- Marcel Broersma
(Department of Media and Journalism Studies, University of Groningen, The Netherlands)
- Julia Noordegraaf
(Department of Media Studies, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
Abstract
In the domain of media and communication research, copyright and privacy issues provide significant obstacles to achieving the strategic goals of open science. Investigating the role of different media in shaping public debates is especially difficult, as research across different media collections and platforms is not yet systematically supported by open research infrastructures on a global scale. Moreover, the private ownership of crucial communication spaces such as social media results in unreliable access opportunities for researchers and unclear conditions regarding the completeness and integrity of data where platform owners provide their own archives. This also creates obstacles for users without a technical background who are interested in gathering information, exploring, or making sense of big data. In response to these challenges, a consortium of two universities (the University of Amsterdam and the University of Groningen), two national archives (the National Library of the Netherlands and the Netherlands Institute for Sound & Vision), and SURF as a national research IT supporter created Twi-XL: Designed to facilitate cross-media research, it provides a research environment in which users of varying computational skill levels can apply automated methods to a range of archival collections, including websites, public broadcasts, radio and podcast transcripts, and over 10 years of Dutch tweets. The societal relevance of Twi-XL lies in creating a user-friendly tool that can be used by researchers to analyze societal phenomena across social media and traditional media, capturing how public debate unfolds across interconnected media environments. We describe and demonstrate the functional logic of Twi-XL with two use cases focused on: (a) social media affordances and users’ practices of news sharing, and (b) the broader public debate on sexual misconduct. Going beyond the dominance of the English language in cross-media research, our results not only showcase the advantages of developing cross-media infrastructures specific to the Dutch language, but also how Twi-XL can be utilized in qualitative and quantitative research. Embedding Twi-XL in the broader discussion on transparency, reproducibility, and accessibility, we discuss the implications and feasibility of such infrastructures, particularly for analyzing social media content.
Suggested Citation
Danielle A. Maxwell-Fraser & Iris M. Baas & Sarah Burkhardt & Olga Eisele & Anne C. Kroon & Robert Jan Bood & Iris Geldermans & Sophie Ham & Machiel Jansen & Rana Klein & Matthijs Moed & Roeland Ordel, 2026.
"Twi-XL: An Infrastructure for Cross-Media Research in the Netherlands,"
Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
Handle:
RePEc:cog:meanco:v14:y:2026:a:12018
DOI: 10.17645/mac.12018
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v14:y:2026:a:12018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.