Author
Listed:
- Pip Heldoorn
(Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, The Netherlands)
- Joël Hendrix
(Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, The Netherlands)
- Lisa Vandeberg
(Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, The Netherlands)
- Serena Daalmans
(Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, The Netherlands)
Abstract
Dressed in lavish, floral dresses, tightly knotted aprons, bold red lips, and armed with a wooden rolling pin, tradwives are increasingly appearing on the social media timelines of many. Tradwives, also called traditional women, are a relatively new and popular social media phenomenon. These women live according to traditional norms and values and advocate them through social media posts and blogs. As such, they cultivate a carefully curated traditional view of women as homemakers and mothers, and men as providers. In the media, this trend is often framed as a backlash against feminism. Even though there is some research into what motivates tradwives themselves, what remains lacking is how women give meaning to tradwives as a social media phenomenon. Based on 16 interviews with women of various backgrounds, this qualitative study reveals that women engage in a complex process of meaning-making to form evaluations of tradwives and the content they make. The participants carefully balance their opinions about one’s right to choose, as a form of choice feminism, against deeply felt gendered norms and personal moral judgments regarding this particular choice. Additionally, women view the trend as both a lifestyle choice and a form of resistance to progressive developments worldwide.
Suggested Citation
Pip Heldoorn & Joël Hendrix & Lisa Vandeberg & Serena Daalmans, 2026.
"#TradWives: A Qualitative Meaning-Making Study of Gendered Norms, Moral Appropriation, and Feminism,"
Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
Handle:
RePEc:cog:meanco:v14:y:2026:a:11927
DOI: 10.17645/mac.11927
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v14:y:2026:a:11927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.