IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v14y2026a11677.html

Different Shades of Cooperation: Mapping Political Parties’ Involvement With Influencers

Author

Listed:
  • Nils S. Borchers

    (Institute of Media Studies, University of Tübingen, Germany)

Abstract

As social media influencers receive increased attention as intermediaries in the political domain, political parties are seeking to expand their involvement with them. However, knowledge of how parties get involved with influencers remains limited. This study presents a qualitative mapping of parties’ influencer engagement, drawing on a secondary analysis of two datasets containing a combined 25 expert interviews with party communicators from Germany. It theorizes influencer involvement as the parties’ management of social interactions. Employing an adapted version of Godes et al.’s (2005) framework for analyzing a firm’s management of social interactions, it systemizes the 35 identified cases of influencer involvement as instances of different management strategies. While the moderator strategy—characterized by relationship-building and information exchange—emerged as the most prevalent, the participant strategy—marked by partisan collaboration—enjoyed the highest popularity. Overall, the findings indicate that the parties’ influencer involvement is still in a formative phase, marked by experimental practices, resource constraints, and ambivalence toward influencer autonomy.

Suggested Citation

  • Nils S. Borchers, 2026. "Different Shades of Cooperation: Mapping Political Parties’ Involvement With Influencers," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v14:y:2026:a:11677
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.11677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/11677
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.11677?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v14:y:2026:a:11677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.