Author
Listed:
- Raphaël Baptista
(Centro de Administração e Políticas Públicas (ISCSP-ULisboa), Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal)
- Paulo Martins
(Centro de Administração e Políticas Públicas (ISCSP-ULisboa), Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal)
- Carla Cruz
(Centro de Administração e Políticas Públicas (ISCSP-ULisboa), Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal)
- Célia Belim
(Centro de Administração e Políticas Públicas (ISCSP-ULisboa), Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal)
Abstract
The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into journalism is reshaping professional routines while raising ethical, organisational, and normative challenges. Despite the growing presence of AI tools in newsrooms, empirical knowledge of how journalists perceive and negotiate their use remains limited, particularly in specific national contexts such as Portugal. This study explores how Portuguese journalists use and perceive AI in their professional practice, examining motivations for adoption, perceived benefits and risks, and the negotiation between human judgment and AI-generated content. Drawing on uses and gratifications theory (UGT) and the communicative AI paradigm, the study adopts a qualitative method based on semi-structured online interviews with 19 journalists from diverse media sectors, roles, age groups, and career stages. Data were analysed using framework analysis. Findings indicate that journalists primarily frame AI as a technical support tool that enhances efficiency and facilitates routine tasks such as transcription, translation, and information processing. At the same time, strong concerns emerge regarding transparency, algorithmic bias, professional autonomy, credibility, and editorial responsibility. Although AI is widely perceived as inevitable, its legitimacy is seen as dependent on ethical frameworks, organisational regulation, and sustained human oversight. The study contributes to research on AI and journalism by integrating motivational and normative perspectives, highlighting how instrumental uses of AI coexist with deeper reconfigurations of professional authority and journalistic values. It further recommends the development of ethical guidelines, transparency mechanisms, organisational policies, and targeted training to support responsible and informed AI adoption in journalism.
Suggested Citation
Raphaël Baptista & Paulo Martins & Carla Cruz & Célia Belim, 2026.
"Between Bits and News: Portuguese Journalists’ Uses and Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence,"
Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
Handle:
RePEc:cog:meanco:v14:y:2026:a:11358
DOI: 10.17645/mac.11358
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v14:y:2026:a:11358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.