IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v11y2023i4p274-285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Watching the Watchdogs: Using Transparency Cues to Help News Audiences Assess Information Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Keith Norambuena

    (Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, USA / Department of Computing and Systems Engineering, Universidad Católica del Norte, Chile)

  • Katharina Reis Farina

    (School of Communication, Virginia Tech, USA)

  • Michael Horning

    (School of Communication, Virginia Tech, USA)

  • Tanu Mitra

    (Information School, University of Washington, USA)

Abstract

The myriad of information sources available online can make it hard for the average reader to know whether a piece of content is credible or not. This research aims to understand if the public’s assessment of the credibility of information could be more accurate with the help of transparency features that act as heuristic cues under the elaboration likelihood model and the heuristic-systematic model, and if the cues increase cognitive absorption. Two between-subjects studies were performed, one with a young demographic (N = 68) and another with a representative sample of the adult population (N = 325). The stimuli contained information boxes designed to indicate that the story was not written in a traditional journalistic style (message cues) and missing background information on the author (source cues). Results show significant effects of the cues on credibility assessment and cognitive absorption.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Keith Norambuena & Katharina Reis Farina & Michael Horning & Tanu Mitra, 2023. "Watching the Watchdogs: Using Transparency Cues to Help News Audiences Assess Information Quality," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 274-285.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:274-285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7018
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:274-285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.