IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v11y2023i1p252-236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Content Analysis From a Gender Perspective of Comments Received by Spanish Science YouTubers

Author

Listed:
  • Belén Cambronero-Saiz

    (Faculty of Business and Communication, Universidad Internacional de La Rioja, Spain)

  • Carmen Cristófol-Rodríguez

    (Faculty of Sciences of Communications, University of Málaga, Spain)

  • Jesús Segarra-Saavedra

    (Department of Communication and Social Psychology, University of Alicante, Spain)

Abstract

One of the main features of videos that popularise science on YouTube is the ability to interact with the videos and the YouTubers who generate them. However, some types of interaction are often not gender neutral. In order to identify whether there are gender differences in the type of comments posted on YouTube channels that popularise science, a content analysis of nine such channels hosted by Spanish macro influencers was conducted. A total of 221 videos and 18,873 comments were analysed to identify and classify comments of a personal nature relating to physical appearance, tone of voice, or intellectual capacity, among other aspects. The results show that 7.5% (1,424) of the total number of analysed comments were comments of a personal nature addressed to the channel’s host. Of the videos hosted by women, 95.3% contained at least one positive comment related to their physical appearance, compared to 27% in the case of men. Gender differences were mainly found in negative comments regarding the presenter’s intellectual ability or personality, with women most likely to receive them. These results show that women who face media exposure are more vulnerable to negative sexist comments, which may deter them from professionalisation in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Belén Cambronero-Saiz & Carmen Cristófol-Rodríguez & Jesús Segarra-Saavedra, 2023. "Content Analysis From a Gender Perspective of Comments Received by Spanish Science YouTubers," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 252-236.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:252-236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5971
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:252-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.