IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v10y2022i4p382-390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond Digital Literacy in Australian Prisons: Theorizing “Network Literacy,” Intersectionality, and Female Incarcerated Students

Author

Listed:
  • Susan Hopkins

    (USQ College, University of Southern Queensland, Australia)

Abstract

Incarcerated students, especially women and Indigenous Australians in custody, are among the most marginalized, oppressed, and invisible identities in Australian society today. These prison-based university students experience not only multi-layered disadvantages that derive from intersecting experiences of oppression, including race, gender, and class, but they are also further disadvantaged by the experience of incarceration itself, despite their attempts to improve their life chances and social positioning through distance education. This is partly due to the challenges of learning within prison environments, including disruptions, disparities, and disconnections in terms of access to digital technologies, digital literacies, and digital channels. The majority of Australian prisoners have no direct access to the internet, smartphones, or internet-enabled devices which means they are disconnected from social media and other networked communication platforms. Although significant gains have been made in developing and delivering prison-based non-networked digital devices, digital learning platforms and digital education to Australian incarcerated students over the past decade, more work must be done to adequately prepare incarcerated students, with multi-faceted needs, to live and learn as empowered agents within the informational capitalism of the contemporary “network society.” The purpose of this article is to argue for a new form of “network literacy” education over and above “digital literacy” skills for female Australian incarcerated students, through an intersectional theoretical lens which addresses the multidimensional disadvantages experienced by women in custody within Australian prisons.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan Hopkins, 2022. "Beyond Digital Literacy in Australian Prisons: Theorizing “Network Literacy,” Intersectionality, and Female Incarcerated Students," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 382-390.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:382-390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5734
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manuel Castells, 2004. "Informationalism, networks, and the network society: a theoretical blueprint," Chapters, in: Manuel Castells (ed.), The Network Society, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Mandy Wilson & Jocelyn Jones & Tony Butler & Paul Simpson & Marisa Gilles & Eileen Baldry & Michael Levy & Elizabeth Sullivan, 2017. "Violence in the Lives of Incarcerated Aboriginal Mothers in Western Australia," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440166, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Çiğdem Bozdağ & Annamária Neag & Koen Leurs, 2022. "Editorial: Inclusive Media Literacy Education for Diverse Societies," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 248-255.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carol Orr & Colleen M Fisher & David B Preen & Rebecca A Glauert & Melissa O’Donnell, 2020. "Exposure to family and domestic violence is associated with increased childhood hospitalisations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Anastasia Petrou & Irene Daskalopoulou, 2015. "Social Capital and Small Business Competitiveness: Evidence from Cross-Section Tourism Data," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(4), pages 946-967, December.
    3. Pollack Ichou, Rachel, 2018. "Can MOOCs reduce global inequality in education?," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 116-120.
    4. Bowen Xiang & Rushuang Chen & Gaofeng Xu, 2022. "Uncovering Network Heterogeneity of China’s Three Major Urban Agglomerations from Hybrid Space Perspective-Based on TikTok Check-In Records," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Selim Raihan & Mahtab Uddin & Sakil Ahmmed, 2021. "Dynamics of Youth and Gender Divide in Technology in Bangladesh," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 22(2), pages 205-232, September.
    6. Celiane Camargo-Borges & Emerson F. Rasera, 2013. "Social Constructionism in the Context of Organization Development," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(2), pages 21582440134, May.
    7. Larson, James F., 2017. "Network-centric digital development in Korea: Origins, growth and prospects," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 916-930.
    8. Young, Jason & Gilmore, Michael, 2017. "Participatory Uses of Geospatial Technologies to Leverage Multiple Knowledge Systems within Development Contexts: A Case Study from the Peruvian Amazon," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 389-401.
    9. Irene Daskalopoulou & Anastasia Petrou, 2009. "Urban Tourism Competitiveness: Networks and the Regional Asset Base," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(4), pages 779-801, April.
    10. Ronit Lentin, 2006. "Migrant women's networks and intercultural Ireland," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp148, IIIS.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:382-390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.