IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v10y2022i1p371-383.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Privacy Paradox by Proxy: Considering Predictors of Sharenting

Author

Listed:
  • Niamh Ní Bhroin

    (Department of Media and Communication, University of Oslo, Norway)

  • Thuy Dinh

    (Centre for Social and Educational Research, Technological University Dublin, Ireland)

  • Kira Thiel

    (Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut, Germany)

  • Claudia Lampert

    (Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut, Germany)

  • Elisabeth Staksrud

    (Department of Media and Communication, University of Oslo, Norway)

  • Kjartan Ólafsson

    (Department of Media and Communication, University of Oslo, Norway)

Abstract

Despite being worried that children may compromise their privacy by disclosing too much personal data online, many parents paradoxically share pictures and information about their children themselves, a practice called sharenting. In this article we utilise data from the EU Kids Online survey to investigate this paradox. We examine both how individual characteristics such as demographics and digital skills, and relational factors, including parental mediation styles, concerns about children’s privacy, and communication between parents and children influence sharenting practices. Counter-intuitively, our findings show that parents with higher levels of digital skills are more likely to engage in sharenting. Furthermore, parents who actively mediate their children’s use of the internet and are more concerned about the privacy of their children, are also more likely to engage in sharenting. At the same time, and further emphasising the complexities of this relational practice, many parents do not ask for their children’s consent in advance of sharing information about them. Overall, parents seem to consider the social benefits of sharenting to outweigh the potential risks both for themselves and for their children. Given the paradoxical complexities of sharenting practices, we propose further research is required to distinguish between different kinds of sharenting and their potential implications for children and young people’s right to privacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Niamh Ní Bhroin & Thuy Dinh & Kira Thiel & Claudia Lampert & Elisabeth Staksrud & Kjartan Ólafsson, 2022. "The Privacy Paradox by Proxy: Considering Predictors of Sharenting," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 371-383.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:371-383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4858
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudia Riesmeyer & Arne Freya Zillich & Thorsten Naab, 2022. "Editorial: Digital Child- and Adulthood—Risks, Opportunities, and Challenges," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 301-304.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:371-383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.