IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The Judicial Development of Law Beyond Statutory Limits in the Draft of the Civil Code

Listed author(s):
  • Petr Bezouska


    (University of West Bohemia in Pilsen)

Registered author(s):

    The draft of the Czech Civil Code tries to describe, in some way, the rules for determining the law, and thereby render the process objective. By so doing, it apparently differs from the existing concept and seeks guidance from foreign legal regulations. My primary goal is to point out such sources of inspiration and to perform a basic comparison of the approaches adopted by different European countries. At the same time, I want to focus in the introduction on the broad context of the Europeanization of private law. The core of my research focuses on the rule involved in Section 10 (2) of the draft of the Czech Civil Code, which represents the legalization of the judicial development of law and provils guidelines on how judges should proceed when filling the “gaps” in legislation, if the legal regulation does not provide any clues (development of law beyond statutory limits) and, at the same time, it is obvious that the law-makers keep silent intentionally (i.e. a qualified silence or an intentional gap in the legislation).

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by European Association Comenius - EACO in its journal DANUBE: Law and Economics Review.

    Volume (Year): (2011)
    Issue (Month): 1 (March)
    Pages: 73-83

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:cmn:journl:y:2011:i:1:p:73-83
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmn:journl:y:2011:i:1:p:73-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Helena Campbelle)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.