IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/seapas/y2014i4p433-438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis Between Classical Evaluation And M-Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Alin ZAMFIROIU

    (University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Assessment of students is achieved in a classical way thought paper with open questions or questions that the student choose the correct answer from a list provided in the question or the submission of projects completed during the school year. The results of the evaluation are provided in another meeting of teacher with the students, after teacher corrects their evaluation. Another way of evaluation is the assessment of students through mobile devices: M-Evaluation. This paper presents an analysis of the results obtained by 79 students through various modes of evaluation: M-Evaluation, projects and final exam. And presented the degree to which a student gets a note through the three modes of evaluation. The scope of the paper is to present the importance of using the M-Evalution in educational environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Alin ZAMFIROIU, 2014. "Analysis Between Classical Evaluation And M-Evaluation," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 4, pages 433-438, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cmj:seapas:y:2014:i:4:p:433-438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/SPAS_4_50.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    M-Learning; M-Evaluation; Mobile devices; Mobile application; Evaluation results;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:seapas:y:2014:i:4:p:433-438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.