IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/networ/y2020i16p125-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison Of The Hungarian Plants Of Eyeglass Lens Manufacturers Zeiss, Hoya And Specsavers Between 2014-2019

Author

Listed:
  • Péter BAJNAI

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Péter POPOVICS

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary)

Abstract

In recent decades, three major representatives of the global eyeglass lens industry have established subsidiaries in the same Hungarian settlement, Mátészalka, which has a significant past and experience in the sector. The plants of the German Zeiss, the Japanese Hoya and the British Specsavers rely on the manufacturing, processing, framing and distribution of eyeglass lenses. The companies are direct competitors of each other in terms of both sales and labour market. The following analysis presents these companies based on various indicators such as net sales revenue, after-tax profit, ROS and ROA indices, number of employees, average wage and productivity, consumer awareness and brand loyalty. It also reveals differences in size, performance, and profitability among the organizations. Hoya's plant stands out in various respects due to its prominent position and dynamic development within the company group. Zeiss seems to be coming to a halt, its performance has declined in comparison to Hoya in recent years, its position within the group is weaker than that of its competitor. Specsavers carries out activities of lower profitability in its local plant; therefore, it can be less profitable than its competitors.

Suggested Citation

  • Péter BAJNAI & Péter POPOVICS, 2020. "Comparison Of The Hungarian Plants Of Eyeglass Lens Manufacturers Zeiss, Hoya And Specsavers Between 2014-2019," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 16, pages 125-134, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cmj:networ:y:2020:i:16:p:125-134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/NIS_16_4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Profitability; Eyeglass lens industry; Consumer brand awareness; Cluster; Operational efficiency; ROS and ROA indexes;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:networ:y:2020:i:16:p:125-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.