Scientific, Social And Political View In The State Of Normality And The Influence Of Antisocial Systems On It

This paper is trying to prove how social normality should start from a prescriptive, judicial reflection of democratic rationality in social-economic relations instead of starting from the generalization of exceptions under the form of normativity. From the point of view of realistic systemic knowledge, “real levels” and “necessary levels”, as well as the rational interaction between them can be determined sufficiently accurate for all social sub-systems, based on present knowledge. The necessary and sufficient condition is that self-regulatory decisions are independent of the speculative groups of the society (i.e. of politics and oligopolies). There are numberless approaches for separating governance from politics but the social power which supports these approaches is still incomparably smaller than the power of those who do not want social normality. University education is meant to explain this theoretical dualism that reflects, in fact, real economic – social dualism and to propose solutions toward really democratic, social normality to new generations. Therefore, if each university specialization does not receive a minimum information level on patterns of social self-regulation and social normality, the rapid progress to such a state is permanently hindered by the groups of interests that control the power of states.