IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/lawsor/y2018i4p39-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natural And Social Status. Historical And Legal Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Marius ANDREESCU

    (Court of Appeal Pitesti, Universitu of Pitesti, Faculty of Economic Sciences and Law)

  • Andra PURAN

    (Universitu of Pitesti, Faculty of Economic Sciences and Law)

  • Claudia ANDREESCU

    (National School of Political and Administrative Sciences, Bucharest; Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Babeş–Bolyai” University of Cluj-Napoca)

Abstract

The history of philosophy and the history of legal doctrines mention and analyze the differences, often categorical, between the existence of man in his natural status and on the other hand, his existence in social status. The doctrine of the social contract is the mainstream of the thought that analyzes the existential status of man in the social environment and the natural environment by arguing, according to the author and the philosophical conception, the historical, social and juridical particularities of the natural status and social status. In our study we support the compatibility between the two existential forms of man, we identify the existential categories in which these can be defined, and emphasize the implications of these categories in realization of the act of justice.

Suggested Citation

  • Marius ANDREESCU & Andra PURAN & Claudia ANDREESCU, 2018. "Natural And Social Status. Historical And Legal Implications," Law, Society & Organisations, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 4 (1/2018, pages 39-45, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cmj:lawsor:y:2018:i:4:p:39-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/LSO_4_5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:lawsor:y:2018:i:4:p:39-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.