IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/lawsor/y2017i3p83-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Constitutional Principle Of Equality - Legal Significance And Social Implications -

Author

Listed:
  • Marius ANDREESCU

    (Court of Appeal Pitesti, Faculty of Economical Sciences and Law, University of Pitesti)

  • Andra PURAN

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences and Law, University of Pitesti)

  • Claudia ANDREESCU

    (National School of Political and Administrative Sciences Bucharest)

Abstract

The equality in human rights and obligations, the equality of citizens before the law are fundamental categories of the theories on social democracy but also conditions of the lawful state, without which constitutional democracy cannot be conceived. In Romanian Constitution, this principle is consecrated in the form of equality of the citizens before the law and public authorities. There are also particular aspects of this principle consecrated in the Constitution. The constitutional principle of equality requires that equal treatment be applied to equal situations. This social and legal reality implies numerous interferences between the principle of equality and other constitutional principles. In this study, by using theoretical and jurisprudential arguments, we intend to demonstrate that, in relation to contemporary social reality, equality, as a constitutional principle, is a particular aspect of the principle of proportionality. The latter one expresses in essence the ideas of: fairness, justice, reasonableness and fair appropriateness of state decisions to the facts and legitimate aims proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Marius ANDREESCU & Andra PURAN & Claudia ANDREESCU, 2017. "The Constitutional Principle Of Equality - Legal Significance And Social Implications -," Law, Society & Organisations, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 3 (2/2017, pages 83-92, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cmj:lawsor:y:2017:i:3:p:83-92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/LSO_3_4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:lawsor:y:2017:i:3:p:83-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.