IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/lawsor/y2017i2p29-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Object Of The Contract From The Perspective Of The Current Civil Code

Author

Listed:
  • Raluca Antoanetta TOMESCU

    (Universitatea Nicolae Titulescu Bucuresti)

Abstract

An indispensable element of social relations, primarily the contract governs our existence. Virtually anything in our lives is governed by contracts. Any move we make, school, work performed, marriage, holidays, a house or a new car, will lead to the acceptance of a contract, or are a consequence of their existence. In the light of the codifications set forth in the current Civil Code, which regularly follows the modern proposals for contract rules, the legislator gives us a clear perspective on its essential conditions of validity. Thus, along with the ability to contract and the consent of the parties, as essential conditions of validity of the contract, the cause and object of the contract also arise. The purpose of this study is therefore to reflect upon the meaning of some terms such as "the object of the contract", "the object of the obligation" or "the object of the benefit" in agreement with the regulations contained in the current Civil Code, especially because in practice but sometimes also in legal doctrine, sufficient attention is not given to the legal sense of each of them, the current rule bringing clarifying regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Raluca Antoanetta TOMESCU, 2017. "Object Of The Contract From The Perspective Of The Current Civil Code," Law, Society & Organisations, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 2 (1/2017, pages 29-33, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cmj:lawsor:y:2017:i:2:p:29-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/LSO_2_4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:lawsor:y:2017:i:2:p:29-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.