IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/journl/y2018i2p131-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis Of Differences In The Way That Pupils With And Without Speech Disorders Make Use Of Their Learning Styles

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia FĂT

    (University of Bucharest)

  • Georgeta PÂNIȘOARĂ

    (University of Bucharest)

  • Cristina GHIȚĂ

    (University of Bucharest)

  • Liliana MÂȚĂ

    (Vasile Alecsandri, University of Bacău)

Abstract

The present article aims to describe various types of learning styles and how learning could be improved for further progress. Although there is plenty of scientific research on learning styles, the test outcomes are not widely used in learning practice. This research was designed to identify the learning style of over 20 children with and without speech difficulties, using the questionnaire adapted by P. Honey and A. Mumford in 1986, from Kolb’s experiential cycle. The investigation aims to answer two questions: 1. what learning styles are frequently used by children between 6-10 years old? 2. are there different preferences of the children with and without language disorders? As a conclusion to these findings, the article will reveal some educational implications of the SL testing act.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia FĂT & Georgeta PÂNIȘOARĂ & Cristina GHIȚĂ & Liliana MÂȚĂ, 2018. "An Analysis Of Differences In The Way That Pupils With And Without Speech Disorders Make Use Of Their Learning Styles," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 2, pages 13-138, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cmj:journl:y:2018:i:2:p:131-138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/CMJ2018_I2_7.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Donald & Beverley Jackling, 2007. "Approaches to learning accounting: a cross‐cultural study," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(2), pages 100-121, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mouhcine Tallaki & Enrico Bracci & Monia Castellini, 2015. "Accounting learning preferences: the role of visualisation," Working Papers 2015094, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    2. Yang, Helen Hong & Craig, Russell & Farley, Alan, 2015. "A review of Chinese and English language studies on corporate environmental reporting in China," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 30-48.
    3. Duff, Angus & Mladenovic, Rosina, 2015. "Antecedents and consequences of accounting students' approaches to learning: A cluster analytic approach," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 321-338.
    4. Beverley Jackling & Monica Keneley, 2009. "Influences on the supply of accounting graduates in Australia: a focus on international students," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 49(1), pages 141-159, March.
    5. Belete J. Bobe & Barry J. Cooper, 2020. "Accounting students’ perceptions of effective teaching and approaches to learning: impact on overall student satisfaction," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 2099-2143, September.
    6. Janse van Rensburg, Cecile & Coetzee, Stephen A. & Schmulian, Astrid, 2014. "South African financial reporting students' reading comprehension of the IASB Conceptual Framework," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 1-15.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:journl:y:2018:i:2:p:131-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.