IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Technology, Source Of Economic Progress

  • Viorel V. POP

    (Economics Faculty, V. Goldis Western University of Arad Romania)

Registered author(s):

    The progressive nature of scientific research is probably the most impressive example that can be given for the term of "progress", together with the belief that subsequent ages are improvements of the previous ones. Economic analysis of technical progress is to determine the effects of the use of new production methods, upon the performance of the economy. Technical progress, the result of research and development activity, is measured by productivity gains and by increasing the quality of the products. Technical progress can also determine the relative decrease of the price of the new goods, causing the increase of profitability and consumer benefits. Competition motivates companies in developing new products and new technologies for producing goods, less expensive. Innovation is not limited to the adoption of new technology, being the process by which technology is developed step by step, until production structures of the company acquire their new performance features, thus providing variety and higher quality of the products and remarkable fact, more accessible to the average consumer.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Editorial Department, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii in its journal Management Intercultural.

    Volume (Year): (2013)
    Issue (Month): 29 (October)
    Pages: 273-279

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:cmj:interc:y:2013:i:29:pop
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:interc:y:2013:i:29:pop. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Serghie Dan)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.