IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmc/annals/v20y2013i2p247-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Different ways of analysing the effects of public-private partnership in organizing public services

Author

Listed:
  • Mina Simona

    (Constanta Maritime University Romania)

  • Surugiu Ioana

    (Constanta Maritime University Romania)

Abstract

Public-private partnership has been presented as an opportunity to improve the input and output legitimacy of global environmental governance. Functional decentralization can generate a considerable improvement in the quality of life of the population and in the functioning of a city and its services. We reported in this paper some conclusions regarding externalisation, public-private partnership and improving the quality of life of the correct organizing of public services. We exemplified the well practice examples from Canadian Experience, Northern Europe Experience, UK private sector participation in Governance, and the Romanian case. After an important qualitative analyse of all these results we established if the New Public Management ideas are correct, or not. Some of the results contradict the New Public Management ideas: mainly that private sector participation through public-private partnerships in the delivery of public services will inevitably lead to a better use of scarce resources, and consequentially to lower user prices and higher quality goods and services. Our empirical analysis demonstrates that user prices have a stronger relationship with the organizational costs than with property or the adopted management model in the delivery of public services. The article offers a view of understanding that any solution to rebalancing budgets and world markets or to improving jobs and incomes will involve the public sector will be key issues for all comparative political economists studying the fundamental conflicts over income, equality and jobs in the years to come

Suggested Citation

  • Mina Simona & Surugiu Ioana, 2013. "Different ways of analysing the effects of public-private partnership in organizing public services," Constanta Maritime University Annals, Constanta Maritime University, vol. 20(2), pages 247-250.
  • Handle: RePEc:cmc:annals:v:20:y:2013:i:2:p:247-250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cmu-edu.eu/RePEc/cmc/annals/247-v20.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guido Codecasa & Davide Ponzini, 2011. "Public-Private Partnership: A Delusion for Urban Regeneration? Evidence from Italy," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 647-667, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Metaxas, Theodore & Preza, Elisavet, 2012. "Public- Private Partnerships in Southeastern Europe: The case of Croatia," MPRA Paper 43830, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Zhang, Jiayu & Yang, Xiaodong & Wang, Hao, 2021. "Age-friendly regeneration of urban settlements in China: Game and incentives of stakeholders in decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    3. Bruce M. Taylor & Ben P. Harman, 2016. "Governing urban development for climate risk: What role for public–private partnerships?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(5), pages 927-944, August.
    4. Veiko LEMBER & Ole Helby PETERSEN & Walter SCHERRER & Robert ÅGREN, 2019. "Understanding The Relationship Between Infrastructure Public‒Private Partnerships And Innovation," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(2), pages 371-391, June.
    5. Martijn van den Hurk & Marlies Hueskes, 2017. "Beyond the financial logic: Realizing valuable outcomes in public–private partnerships in Flanders and Ontario," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(5), pages 784-808, August.
    6. Pascual Berrone & Joan Enric Ricart & Ana Isabel Duch & Valeria Bernardo & Jordi Salvador & Juan Piedra Peña & Miquel Rodríguez Planas, 2019. "EASIER: An Evaluation Model for Public–Private Partnerships Contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.
    7. Annalisa Caloffi & Francesca Gambarotto, 2017. "Cognitive distance in public procurement and public–private partnerships: An analysis of the construction sector," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(5), pages 765-783, August.
    8. Li, Lingyue & Xiao, Yang, 2022. "Capital accumulation and urban land development in China: (Re)making Expo Park in Shanghai," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    9. Chin, Jae Teuk, 2021. "The shifting role of public–private partnerships in vacant property redevelopment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R0 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General
    • R4 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmc:annals:v:20:y:2013:i:2:p:247-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Georgiana Buzu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cmu-edu.eu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.