IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/clh/resear/v2y2009i4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competition in Canadian Health Care Service Provision: Good, Bad, or Indifferent?

Author

Listed:
  • Jane E. Ruseski

    (Department of Economics, University of Alberta)

Abstract

Most provincial health care systems in Canada combine public, private non-profit, and private for-profit delivery. In Alberta, the Health Care Protection Act, known as Bill 11, allows the public to purchase certain insured surgical services from private providers. This legislation sparked a heated and ongoing debate in Canada about the role of competition in health care service delivery. The key question asked is what can be gained from introducing competition among hospital and physician services while maintaining a public payment system. This paper evaluates what has been learned from the recent literature on competition in health care markets in the context of expanding the role of the private sector in Alberta. The evidence does not provide a definitive answer. Competition introduced by an expanded private sector is likely to be beneficial on some measures, indifferent on others, but not likely bad.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane E. Ruseski, 2009. "Competition in Canadian Health Care Service Provision: Good, Bad, or Indifferent?," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 2(4), November.
  • Handle: RePEc:clh:resear:v:2:y:2009:i:4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/ruseski-online-28-oct-09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:clh:resear:v:2:y:2009:i:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bev Dahlby (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/spcalca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.