IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/clh/resear/v14y2021i9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidence-based and Community-engaged Pandemic Responses for Calgary

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Kohek

    (University of Calgary, School of Public Policy)

  • Meaghan Edwards

    (University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine)

  • Katrina Milaney

    (University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine)

  • Jennifer Zwicker

    (University of Calgary, School of Public Policy)

Abstract

To optimally support the health of families, interventions provided by community organizations must be evidence-based. As well, strategies should be locally informed to ensure relevancy of interventions and smooth incorporation of research within existing systems. While research attracts awareness to particular community issues, there is often a disconnect between research collection and subsequent translation into community-level policies. Greater focus on evidence-based and community-engaged interventions are necessary to mobilize research into practice, and ultimately improve outcomes for families who rely on services. COVID-19 has highlighted the pre-existing political, economic, and structural impediments to knowledge mobilization that community organizations contend with. To better understand existing evidence on the role of support, communication, and funding approaches that facilitate knowledge mobilization from a community engagement perspective, a scan of the literature was conducted and summarized. These findings were then contextualized to understand the specific priorities and issues in Calgary using the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) to engage diverse stakeholder groups. Five NGT groups were held over the course of two weeks to generate ideas surrounding barriers to evidence-based service provision throughout COVID-19, as well as solutions that have the potential to address aforementioned challenges. Though the engagement process, focus group members of community-service organizations identified barriers to evidence-based service provision, including the inefficacy and practicality of virtual service delivery, a lack of clarity and consistency among various government pandemic protocols, staffing and scheduling challenges, and the effect of short-term funding structures on collaboration within the sector. These difficulties are heightened by pre-existing vulnerabilities, as vulnerable families are most likely to be adversely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing public health restrictions implemented. To improve the ability of organizations to deliver community-centred and evidencebased services for this pandemic, and to prepare better for future emergencies, common themes included person-centered policy and program approaches and reciprocal partnership development. Findings led to three policy approaches that could be considered towards evidence based, community engaged pandemic response: (1) education and consultation with community organizations, (2) subsidy and grant provision for community-based research, and (3) formalizing a local network of researchers, community organizations, and policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Kohek & Meaghan Edwards & Katrina Milaney & Jennifer Zwicker, 2021. "Evidence-based and Community-engaged Pandemic Responses for Calgary," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 14(9), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:clh:resear:v:14:y:2021:i:9
    DOI: 10.11575/sppp.v14i.71625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v14i.71625
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.11575/sppp.v14i.71625?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:clh:resear:v:14:y:2021:i:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bev Dahlby (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/spcalca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.