IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The Productivity Gap Between the United States and the Euro Zone Continues to Widen

Listed author(s):
  • Michel Fouquin

From 1950 to 1970, labour productivity levels converged between the United States – considered to be the global technological leader – Western European countries and Japan. But thereafter this process gradually became less marked before disappearing completely since the mid-1990s: while in the United States, labour productivity growth accelerated, it slowed down in the majority of European countries and Japan. Technological progress, associated with the development of information and communication technologies (ICT), goes some way towards explaining the revival of productivity in the USA, before the dotcom bubble burst. However, it does not tally with the decline seen in Europe because, although the level of investment in ICTs in Europe falls some way behind that of the USA, it has nonetheless grown significantly. A fundamental explanation for the divergence relates to a change in intensity of the employment component of growth. While it fell sharply in the United States, there was a significant rise in Europe where, prior to the crisis of 2007-2008, mass unemployment fell as a result. The most recent data for 2009 confirm the existence of diverging productivity trends.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by CEPII research center in its journal La Lettre du CEPII.

Volume (Year): (2009)
Issue (Month): 294 ()

in new window

Handle: RePEc:cii:cepill:2009-294
Contact details of provider: Postal:
113, rue de Grenelle, 75700 Paris SP07

Phone: 33 01 53 68 55 00
Fax: 33 01 53 68 55 01
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cii:cepill:2009-294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.