IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Can a Currency Board or a Hard Peg be Unstable? The Case of China

  • Patrick Artus
Registered author(s):

    A currency board (an exchange rate regime where monetary policy depends on the evolution of foreign exchange reserves) is normally stabilizing. A loss of reserves, for instance, leads to an increase in interest rates that slows down production and improves the trade balance, resulting in an increase in foreign exchange reserves. The example of China, however, shows that a currency board or an exchange rates regime very close to a currency board can lead to dynamic instability, with an endless accumulation of foreign exchange reserves. We build a theoretical dynamic model that explains the fluctuations in exchange rate, prices, credit, interest rates and production to examine several processes that could explain this dynamic instability: rigidity of interest rates, absence of international mobility of capital (due for instance to capital controls) endogeneity of the supply of goods and stickiness of prices. The lack of financial liberalisation plays a central role in explaining the absence of stabilizing properties of the currency board in China.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by CEPII research center in its journal Economie Internationale.

    Volume (Year): (2007)
    Issue (Month): 111 ()
    Pages: 9-27

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:cii:cepiei:2007-111a
    Contact details of provider: Postal: 113, rue de Grenelle, 75700 Paris SP07
    Phone: 33 01 53 68 55 00
    Fax: 33 01 53 68 55 01
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cii:cepiei:2007-111a. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.