IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/epofor/v24y2023i03p44-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Remote Work Using a Large Language Model (LLM)

Author

Listed:
  • Peter John Lambert

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) can dramatically improve upon traditional text-based measurement tools used by economists We fit, test and train the “Work-from-Home Algorithmic Measure” (WHAM) model to detect new online job postings offering remote/hybrid arrangements. The WHAM model has near-human accuracy. We deploy this model at scale, processing hundreds of millions of job ads collected across five countries and thousands of cities The share of new ads offering remote/hybrid jobs increased four-fold in the US and more than five-fold in the UK, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, between 2019 and 2023. These data and more are available for researchers at wfhmap.com The “remote work gap” across cities, occupations, and high/low salary workers continues to widen, and the hare of advertised remote/hybrid work is highly skewed towards white-collar workers and cities which are hubs for government, business, technology, and higher education LLMs offer massive potential for empirical research using text data, but one should adhere to best practices and understand the “do’s and don’ts” of these technologies. Generative AI offers immense promise, with some significant limitations

Suggested Citation

  • Peter John Lambert, 2023. "Measuring Remote Work Using a Large Language Model (LLM)," EconPol Forum, CESifo, vol. 24(03), pages 44-49, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:epofor:v:24:y:2023:i:03:p:44-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/econpol-forum-2023-3-lambert-remote-work-may.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:epofor:v:24:y:2023:i:03:p:44-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.