IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ccs/journl/y2018id322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Euroscepticism Level of French Parties Determined by the Content-analysis of Their Pre-election Manifestos

Author

Listed:
  • A. O. DOMANOV

Abstract

The dynamics of Euroscepticism intensity of some French parties is analysed in the given article with the use of Attitude to European integration index. The degree of criticism of the EU is evaluated quantitatively (1-13 points) based on the following data extracted from 2010-2017 party manifestos: attitude to the principal idea of European integration, affective and instrumental support or discontent of the EU, the perception of the EU as an (un-) accountable institution. The elaborated method was proven to be instrumental and reliable for Euroscepticism studies by finding correspondence between the quantitative values of the Index and Russian scholars’ qualitative estimates. This standardized approach to measurement allowed not only to reveal the general attitude of a particular party towards European integration, but also to compare the obtained estimates with indicators for past years, for other parties, and also in other countries. The developed scale let ascertain some strengthening of National Front’s and J.-L. Melenchon’s supporters’ (nowadays – from “Unbowed France†) Euroscepticism and weakening criticism of the EU by gaullists from the “Union for the Popular Movement†and the “Republicans†. Relatively stronger Euroscepticism of the French Communist Party in comparison to the Socialist Party has been confirmed.

Suggested Citation

  • A. O. Domanov, 2018. "Euroscepticism Level of French Parties Determined by the Content-analysis of Their Pre-election Manifestos," Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, Center for Crisis Society Studies, vol. 11(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:ccs:journl:y:2018:id:322
    DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-3-199-212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/viewFile/322/322
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-3-199-212?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ccs:journl:y:2018:id:322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Кривопалов Ð Ð»ÐµÐºÑ ÐµÐ¹ Ð Ð»ÐµÐºÑ ÐµÐµÐ²Ð¸Ñ‡ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.