IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ccs/journl/y2016id239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Present-day bureaucratic organization: managerial analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Dmitry S. Vitashov

Abstract

The article contains existing approaches to bureaucracy. There were defined 4 main management principles in bureaucratic organization on basis of Max Weber’s “rational bureaucracy†theory. They are: hierarchy, specialization, formalization, regulation. There were also defined the very advantages and disadvantages of these principles in accordance with the constraints are made by them. Additionally the management efficiency increase limits were discovered. The growth of both organization structure and the executive process complexity within the organization (as consequences of its growing scale) were named as an objective cause of bureaucratization level increase. At the same time a management team unreadiness to act in conditions of organization scale enlargement can be named as a subjective cause of bureaucratization level increase. Main trends (tendencies) of modern bureaucratic organization development were found due to the in-depth public authority functioning practice analysis. They are: complication of executive system, management virtualization, control hypertrophy, violation of specialization. There were also named the sources of these trends and several methods to overcome them.

Suggested Citation

  • Dmitry S. Vitashov, 2016. "Present-day bureaucratic organization: managerial analysis," Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, Center for Crisis Society Studies, vol. 9(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:ccs:journl:y:2016:id:239
    DOI: undefined
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/viewFile/239/238
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/undefined?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ccs:journl:y:2016:id:239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Кривопалов Ð Ð»ÐµÐºÑ ÐµÐ¹ Ð Ð»ÐµÐºÑ ÐµÐµÐ²Ð¸Ñ‡ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.