IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2026v4p428-440.html

The Negative Perception On Quality Of Life And Populism Support: An Analysis Of The Presidential Elections In Romania In 2025

Author

Listed:
  • NITOI DANIEL

    (RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR QUALITY OF LIFE, ROMANIAN ACADEMY, BUCHAREST, ROMANIA)

  • BAKHAYA ALEXANDRU

    (ACADEMY OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, BUCHAREST, ROMANIA BAKHAYA)

Abstract

This article analyzes the relationship between the negative perception on the quality of life and the rise of contemporary populism, using as a case study the presidential elections in Romania in 2025. Starting from the premise that subjective assessments of living standards influence electoral behavior, it analyzes the extent to which individual dissatisfaction has favored support for parties and leaders with populist discourse. The analysis integrates electoral data, opinion polls and the dynamics of campaign discourse, and the results indicate that electorate segments that expressed a high degree of socio-economic dissatisfaction and distrust in institutions showed a stronger predisposition to support populist parties and leaders. At the same time, the conclusions suggest that the rise of populism in Romania in the post-pandemic period cannot be explained exclusively by ideological factors or campaign strategies, but must be understood in correlation with the dynamics of perceptions of quality of life and the erosion of trust in democratic institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nitoi Daniel & Bakhaya Alexandru, 2026. "The Negative Perception On Quality Of Life And Populism Support: An Analysis Of The Presidential Elections In Romania In 2025," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 428-440, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2026:v:4:p:428-440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.journals.utgjiu.ro/JES/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/39_Nitoi.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2026:v:4:p:428-440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.