IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2026v3p342-349.html

Working Conditions And Employee Well-Being: An Empirical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • BACAINTAN NARCIS PARIS

    (OVIDIUS UNIVERSITY OF CONSTANȚA, CONSTANȚA, ROMANIA DOCTORAL SCHOOL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION)

Abstract

The study examines the relationship between working conditions and employee well-being, based on the premise that the work experience is multidimensional and includes both organizational resources and stress factors. The research employs a quantitative approach based on the analysis of data from the European Social Survey, selecting respondents who are currently employed and have provided valid responses for the variables under analysis. By applying exploratory factor analysis using the Principal Components method with Varimax rotation, four main dimensions were identified: work–family conflict and occupational stress, subjective well-being, organizational support and professional integration, and professional autonomy. The results confirm the multidimensional nature of working conditions and support the hypotheses regarding the positive role of organizational support and autonomy, as well as the negative effect of work–life conflict on employee well-being. The study contributes to understanding how different dimensions of work shape the professional experience and offers practical implications for organizational policies aimed at improving quality of life in the workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Bacaintan Narcis Paris, 2026. "Working Conditions And Employee Well-Being: An Empirical Analysis," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 342-349, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2026:v:3:p:342-349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2026-03/32_BAcaiantan.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2026:v:3:p:342-349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.