IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2026v2p266-274.html

Soft Skills: Evolution, Ambiguities And The Limits Of The Concept

Author

Listed:
  • ANDREI DALINA-MARIA

    (INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC FORECASTING, ROMANIAN ACADEMY)

Abstract

This article searches for basics and evolution of the concept of „soft skills” in the literature. From the first formulations of the term to the contemporary definitions used in economic research and in studies on the labor market the main relevant contributions in theory are traced. The approach is guided by the definitory question: which soft skills are recurrently identified and defined in the literature and how they have been conceptualized over time (?). The paper highlights both the diversity of conceptual approaches and the persistent ambiguities associated with this term, including its uneven use, its overlaps with other categories of skills and the risks accompanying its normative application in some management contexts. At the same time, the measurement limits and the difficulties of making soft skills work are discussed. At the same, our analysis proposes a clear delimitation between soft skills and hard skills, by referring to criteria such as the nature of the knowledge involved, the ways of acquisition, the degree of transferability and the possibilities of evaluation. It will be in the terms of such undertaking that the "soft skills" notion could be ready to meet at least the processes of education, labour market and work performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrei Dalina-Maria, 2026. "Soft Skills: Evolution, Ambiguities And The Limits Of The Concept," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 266-274, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2026:v:2:p:266-274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2026-02/20_Andrei.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2026:v:2:p:266-274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.