IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2025v3p155-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digitalization And Informality In The Eu: A Pestle-Based Cluster Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • MASTAC LAVINIA

    (BUCHAREST UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMIC STUDIES)

Abstract

This paper analyses the relationship between digitalisation and the shadow economy in European countries, applying a PESTLE (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, Ecological) approach. The study proposes an alternative classification of 30 European countries into three clusters (Low, Medium, High), based on the average shadow economy as a percentage of GDP for the period 2000–2022. The aim is to highlight how the degree of digitalisation interacts with institutional quality and other structural variables to influence the level of tax compliance. The research integrates governance indicators (Control of Corruption, Government Effectiveness, Regulatory Quality) and provides a comparative analysis between groups. The results show that technology is not sufficient to reduce the informal economy in the absence of a coherent, legitimate and functional institutional framework. The study contributes to the literature through an applied, contextualised and differentiated perspective on the role of digitalisation in combating the shadow economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Mastac Lavinia, 2025. "Digitalization And Informality In The Eu: A Pestle-Based Cluster Analysis," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 155-167, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2025:v:3:p:155-167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2025-03/13_Mastac.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2025:v:3:p:155-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Ecobici Nicolae to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.