IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2017v5p104-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing The Relationship Between The Organizational Culture Type And Risks

Author

Listed:
  • Silviu CARSTINA

    (UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA, CRAIOVA, ROMANIA)

  • Maria Magdalena CRIVEANU

    (UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA, CRAIOVA, ROMANIA)

Abstract

Modern studies regarding the employees’ degree of satisfaction in what the work environment is concerned reveal a strong connection between the leadership style practiced by the manager and the achievements and the enthusiasm shown by the employees. Therefore, specialists have noticed that the motivational factors don’t imply only material motivational factors, such as the salary, the work environment, but also a series of moral factors like the acknowledgement of one’s merits, the appreciation of the effort invested (for example, being promoted in the company can validate the employees’ competences) or the possibility that the employee has of organizing his/ her own activity. By this it is meant that the rigid and authoritarian figure of the leader should fade off, which on various occasions inhibits creativity or the employee’s power of making a decision, by having damaging aftermaths concerning the level of performance or the quality of the products. In this respect, the study aims at an evaluation within a private company, in order to establish the kind of relationship between the two cultural dimensions concerning the human resources, i. e. the organizational leadership and the management of employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Silviu CARSTINA & Maria Magdalena CRIVEANU, 2017. "Analysing The Relationship Between The Organizational Culture Type And Risks," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5, pages 104-111, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2017:v:5:p:104-111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2017-05/12_Criveanu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2017:v:5:p:104-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.