IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2016v5p153-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Science- Religion Dialogue. The Case Of Economics

Author

Listed:
  • SANDA DRAGOS CONSTANTIN

    (UNIVERSITY ACADEMY OF ECONOMIC STUDIES)

Abstract

Many of the present day scientists think that religion can never come to terms with science. In sharp contrast with this widespread opinion, this paper argues that, historically, scientific reasoning and religious belief joined hands in their effort to investigate and understand reality. In fact, the present-day divorce between science and religion is nothing else than the final outcome of a gradual, long-term, and deliberately assumed process of science secularization. However, especially during the latest two decades, we are all the same confronted with the advance of a new concern that some of the nowadays scientists have, the one of reviewing the sphere of problems specific to the domains of investigation they are involved in, with the face to the themes that are usually addressed by the theological thought. The paper describes this recent development as being captured by an emerging new field of investigation within the modern scientific epistemology: the dialogue between Science and Religion. It is also shown that the dialogue follows two divergent directions of analysis, namely the scholastic approach and the personalist one, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanda Dragos Constantin, 2016. "Science- Religion Dialogue. The Case Of Economics," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5, pages 153-160, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2016:v:5:p:153-160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2016-05/22_SANDA%20DRAGOS%20CONSTANTIN.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2016:v:5:p:153-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.