IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2014v1p245-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual Investment Decision Making Process. Biases And Remedies

Author

Listed:
  • ADRIAN MITROI

    (BUCHAREST UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, ROMÂNIA, CFA ROMÂNIA, AAFBR ROMÂNIA)

Abstract

In the pursuit of understanding the behavior of the market player, the basic argument relays on the supposition that the risk appetite increases exactly at the worst moment - when the capacity to assume additional risk decreases significantly. People view a sample randomly drawn from a population as highly representative and cvasi similar to the population in all its essential characteristics. They expect any two samples drawn from a particular population to be more similar to one another and to the population than is statistically justifiable. This behavior is different from the tenets of classic finance theory. The article reviews some psychological concepts relevant and used in the study, in an interdisciplinary effort of understanding the correlation or causality between psychology and finance. The statistical interrogation describes the sampling methodology, the frequency of data and the empirical methodology that lead to analysis of the results and concluding remarks. The study provides details on raw statistical test scores, regression results and analysis. In this study, I evaluate the association between investors’ behavior and her portfolio results. The paper aims at demonstrating whether investor psychological biases lead to investment performance to tilt to the mean in the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrian Mitroi, 2014. "Individual Investment Decision Making Process. Biases And Remedies," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 245-252, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2014:v:1:p:245-252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2014-01/36_Mitroi%20Adrian.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2014:v:1:p:245-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.