IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caq/j950ix/doi10.7384-87121y2017i1p27-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EUBS Implementation from a Comparative Perspective: A Chance for Increasing the EU's Legitimacy. The Danish and the Italian Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Tania Bazzani

Abstract

The article aims at providing specific remarks for implementing a European Unemployment Benefit Scheme (EUBS) in the EU Member States. In doing this, this contribution highlights the potential role for the EUBS in helping EU institutions gain legitimacy in the eyes of the European citizens. This topic appears particularly relevant after Brexit, and should not be ignored. In order to deal with this issue, the article proposes to take into consideration two different models, which are sorts of poles apart: the Danish system, in order to point out those aspects that have been crucial for the achievement of a high level of legitimacy in such a labour market policies (LMPs) best practice example; the Italian system, in order to understand whether EU legitimacy could be reached through the EUBS implementation in a State with peculiar problems in LMPs and to highlight practical issues that may need dealing with.

Suggested Citation

  • Tania Bazzani, 2017. "EUBS Implementation from a Comparative Perspective: A Chance for Increasing the EU's Legitimacy. The Danish and the Italian Systems," Economia & lavoro, Carocci editore, issue 1, pages 27-42.
    • Handle: RePEc:caq:j950ix:doi:10.7384/87121:y:2017:i:1:p:27-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.7384/87121
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.7384/87121
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caq:j950ix:doi:10.7384/87121:y:2017:i:1:p:27-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.